Having noted the positions of the anti-liberal UFAL regarding the financing of the health system, I see actions, politics and not many credible proposals in the financing system that is missing for thirty years ..
I have nothing against the current system if it were financed in a sustainable way ... Where are the proposals for funding? That clogs the holes for thirty years (100bn euros of accumulated deficit)? Answer: borrowing on the international finance market and it is fine to have one day repay any
So international finance that is pure capitalism and drive that allows the Safely and its system of solidarity can be deceived for three decades.
The Safely to directly inspired by the French collectivism suffers as communism's economic incompetence has led to its decline and fall ...
Modern socialism is to invent leaving aside old moons and collectivist réunionnite UFALIENNE not change anything because the addition is an addition for everyone and the facts are stubborn.
Again, you would be more useful in defining the criteria for accreditation for health insurance that would be prejudicial to any insurer, Safely understood, because that side there is an obvious absence of a contract and nothing protects policyholders against arbitrary administrative decisions about their health.
Collectivism and old moons of 1946 lead to nothing at the ruin and destruction of so-called solidarity.
Let us think of social protection that is otherwise WITH THE SAME GOALS AND OTHER MEANS.
We go to the wall, thinking to avoid it. If
to avoid the so-called "commodification" of health is going to drift bias tape that all medical reasoning and subjugate all the requirements to insufficient capacity of the system solidarity said bankrupt for thirty years, it falls between Scylla and Charybdis
collectivized assurance system as it stands today the medical profession and the patient is probably the one that poses the greatest risk to everyone is "Soylent Green" in the near future.
Physicians are not the real decision-making center for health and the state is unable to defend really patient because it takes the untenable position of insurer and adjudicator health decisions .. The separation of powers requires that this no longer so .. insurers must do their jobs and the state guarantees the Public health must make his own, by accrediting health insurers that meet defined specifications, and rejecting the others ...
The definition of these criteria for accreditation is the responsibility of associations ... so instead of messing around talking about health insurance and no anti-liberal political archaeo-Marxist.; talk about social and collectivization illusory means, talk about efficiency in the management and development structures .. go for the money where it really is and not where the collectivist fantasies put
Think Welfare otherwise
So international finance that is pure capitalism and drive that allows the Safely and its system of solidarity can be deceived for three decades.
The Safely to directly inspired by the French collectivism suffers as communism's economic incompetence has led to its decline and fall ...
Modern socialism is to invent leaving aside old moons and collectivist réunionnite UFALIENNE not change anything because the addition is an addition for everyone and the facts are stubborn.
Again, you would be more useful in defining the criteria for accreditation for health insurance that would be prejudicial to any insurer, Safely understood, because that side there is an obvious absence of a contract and nothing protects policyholders against arbitrary administrative decisions about their health.
Collectivism and old moons of 1946 lead to nothing at the ruin and destruction of so-called solidarity.
Let us think of social protection that is otherwise WITH THE SAME GOALS AND OTHER MEANS.
We go to the wall, thinking to avoid it. If
to avoid the so-called "commodification" of health is going to drift bias tape that all medical reasoning and subjugate all the requirements to insufficient capacity of the system solidarity said bankrupt for thirty years, it falls between Scylla and Charybdis
collectivized assurance system as it stands today the medical profession and the patient is probably the one that poses the greatest risk to everyone is "Soylent Green" in the near future.
Physicians are not the real decision-making center for health and the state is unable to defend really patient because it takes the untenable position of insurer and adjudicator health decisions .. The separation of powers requires that this no longer so .. insurers must do their jobs and the state guarantees the Public health must make his own, by accrediting health insurers that meet defined specifications, and rejecting the others ...
The definition of these criteria for accreditation is the responsibility of associations ... so instead of messing around talking about health insurance and no anti-liberal political archaeo-Marxist.; talk about social and collectivization illusory means, talk about efficiency in the management and development structures .. go for the money where it really is and not where the collectivist fantasies put
Think Welfare otherwise
0 comments:
Post a Comment