Thursday, April 19, 2007

Infected Lighter Burn

Pate presidential campaign, 2007 - Place your bets, games are made (Part 2)

When you type "Sarkozy" in Goggole, we found that . Become caliph instead of the caliph, he dreams from a young age. And he will do anything for it. Sarkozy prances in the polls since the start or at least that's what we try to make us believe. We know the influence of polls in voting decisions. Whatever evil that can be said of Sarkozy that it is always placed ahead of the vote would tend to show us he has the confidence of voters and that therefore it is the best candidate. What is certain in any case is that with him, "Brave New World" as Aldous Huxley wrote, would soon become possible ...

Little man gets big

His real name is Sarkozy de Nagy-Bosca. It is Hungarian and it means "little marshy place". A predestined name. Physically, with his hangdog eyes, it reminds me of Sylvester Stalone, muscles inflated helium and less sure. It is often presented as excited. It is true that he has plenty of nervous tics (including the mouth and shoulder) and he never stays in place (when it is moving, unless it is seen 1m58). Perhaps because it is a busy man. From the age of 11 years, the question "what-would you like to do later?" He replies, "President of the Republic", as De Gaulle was in power at the time.

Sarkozy was born in 1955 advertising a father from a noble family and Catholic Hungarian mother and a daughter of a Jewish doctor in catholiscisme converted (which will Sarkozy later to dredge Jewish voters by recalling the descent) who, after her husband was unfaithful or did the coach, also became a lawyer. Education of young Nicolas bad start since redoubled his sixth.
bravely overcoming this first failure, as he launches his mother in law studies. To finance his studies, he does odd jobs and is already experimenting with his idea to work more to earn more. After a Master of Private Law (1978), he returned to the IEP in Paris but comes out without a diploma because of a zero playoff pointed in English (he has since made little progress but managed to seduce the U.S.). Finally, he managed the assistance of counsel (1981) and quickly became a partner in a large firm specializing in real estate law will ensure its beautiful annuities (240 000 euros of dividends received in 2002!). He married a permière in 1982 with a Corsican, and takes as best man, Charles Pasqua, about which he said it was "his double" (emphasis less). In 1989, he throws the woman to Jacques Martin (who is no longer a place), Cecilia, and married her in 1996 with the prestigious witnesses Martin Bouygues and Bernard Arnault (are two of the largest fortunes Both France and the head of a media empire). His political

early. He was barely 20 years old when he attended his first political rally in support Chaban in the presidential election of 1974. Member of the RPR at its inception in 1976, he became a councilor in Neuilly-sur-Seine in 1977 and then mayor of that city in 1983 after the untimely death of his predecessor and nose and beard Pasqua who was running for the chair. The ball of betrayal has just begun and with it the meteoric rise of Sarkozy: in 1983 more as mayor, he was elected to the regional council of Ile-de-France (until 1988) then 1985 at the General Council of Hauts-de-Seine (the department's smallest and richest of France) chaired by his first mentor Pasqua until 2004, when he "sells" its up to Sarkozy.

Besides its local mandates, it has national responsibilities: Member of Neuilly in 1988 and constantly re-elected in the 1st round, he became budget minister and spokesman of the government by Baladura after the tsunami, tidal right in the parliamentary elections of 1993. 1993 is a milestone for Sarkozy: first entry in a government and national hero with the taking of hostages from kindergarten through Neuilly a desperate man who made believe he was girded with explosives and was shot like a dog by the RAID even though he could be restrained without bloodshed (using hypodermic bullets for example). To thank Baladura, Sarkozy decided to support him against Chirac in the 1995 presidential. This betrayal will be a fiasco cost him dear: private post in the Juppe government and disgrace (transient) in the RPR.

This little man with lots of resources, it is again virgin, becoming spokesman for the RPR from 1995 to 1997, then acting president in 1999, when he headed the list of RPR-Democracy Liberal in the European elections of 1999 with a beautiful result frigged (provided that history repeats itself?).

defeated but not dead, Sarkozy began a journey through the desert during which he resumed his work as a lawyer and weaves his web of influence that extends to the United States. The score of African Chirac in 2002 Matignon her expectations but it will "only" the Interior Ministry where he works to erect a police state (by the Homeland Security Act of 2003 supplemented by Law Perben , DNA mass registration is extended to anyone suspected of a crime other than financial ...).

The defeat of the right to regional and cantonal elections in 2004 led to a mini cabinet reshuffle in which Sarkozy is leaving the Place Beauveau to Bercy where he was noticed by receiving the Scientologist Tom Cruise. At the same time, he raided the UMP with a score "on Chirac" 85% of the vote and staged his election as Napoleon at his coronation. After the "no" referendum on the TEC, in good Gaullist Chirac, who should have resigned rather turns this incompetent Raffarin tintin-and replaces it with his faithful dog City (perlinpin) pin. Sarko gnawing at the bit to inherit a huge department (Interior and Regional Planning) with the rank of No. 2 Government. Above all, he combines the post of head of the party and Minister of State, what Chirac was banned in 2004 (but hey, that Chirac, eh?). The real boss of France, he and we need all the guile of Chirac to curb its enthusiasm.

Today, Nicolas has become powerful, very powerful since it received the support (political, military and financial) of the masters of the world (translate the U.S. neocons). Especially in what Sarkozy is worrying because he so admires the United States is prepared to offer France ...

If Sarkozy scares citizens base but also to media , some have realized that this could also be lucrative. Example log bayrou Marianne who devoted in its issue of April 14 to 20 whole folder which has been so successful that they were out of stock within 48 hours (300,000 copies sold)! Like what the bizness of fear also works for those who report it.

Work more to get more fuck

is his favorite slogan: "Work more to earn more." As a liberal, the reduction of working time is definitely not a social advancement allowing man to gain more freedom. Rather it is a heresy that runs contrary economic global movement. Besides, he says, and therefore we must believe: "France (that fat lazy) has become the country that works the least in Europe." To be the best, we must work harder and bad for productivity, the only real indicator to measure work performance. Out in this field, France is champion of Europe.

This sensible upgrade work does not, however, is for executives who already crumbling under the overtime hours (and that Sarkozy promised to upgrade 25% more) but to the employees and workers in the competitive sector. How many people have had to accept to work more and thus earn less to keep their jobs due to the threat of outsourcing? In addition, more work when you are maneuvering or VRP with wages over the daisies mostly stands for jeopardizing his health, reduction of leisure and end involvement in the sphere of associations. Return to alienation at work dear to Taylor and Ford. As if the media stupidity was not enough, Sarkozy feels good to add the brutalization by work. Long live slavery!

Sarkozy is optimistic. Thanks to him, he wants (he does not undertake, shade) to achieve full employment in less than 5 years. Knowing that with the combined effect of declining population and the baby boomer retirement, the number of entrants to the labor market decline, the unemployment statistics will always be hacked and all that Sarkozy wants to force those who refuse to work the job offered, one might think will happen to achieve that goal. As in the States, his model ...
Sarko and Sego
are in a boat

The similarities in the programs are obvious: social welfare, housing, family, pension, Europe, outsourcing, utilities in neighborhoods and rural areas. It is full cut and paste. But Sarkozy Royal is more explicit than the text of propaganda is quite poor. Sego, Sarko is the light. When talking about odre just Sego, Sarko replies: "I consider that the authority and respect are fundamental values of our society." But hey, is not Sego Sarko, she does not - or at least does not say - as far as him. No limits



is ultimately what bothers with Sarkozy. One has the impression that he has no limits. Example with its proposed immigration department. Besides the outcry it provoked on the left but that delighted De Villiers and Le Pen, Sarkozy defended himself (TF1), saying that France was the only country in Western Europe (15) do not have this type of ministry and that damn wood, it's not normal to be still lagging behind. Audit by the issuance Freeze , only one country - England - has a dream that department as Sarkozy. We would have preferred that it be the socialos who do the job but this has speaks volumes about their ignorance ...

Also on his control over the media. Sarkozy is the friend of all the major media owners and TV channels and radio. It can be fired overnight a journalist known and recognized (Genestar of Paris Match, the editorial 'chief Figaro), prohibit the publication of a book p
Resentment his wife in a less than flattering. But it may well do nothing and his wishes are still true. Example with this censorship suffered by Laurent Bazin, featured presenter on the channel i-TV (Canal + / Vivendi).

Sarkozy's power is really enormous. Rumors of attacks on Al Qaeda rancid sauce circulating on the net. Mullah Omar, still on his moped mop Pigeot 104, warned the armed forces stationed in Afghanistan to withdraw quickly. France is of course concerned. Attack if it happens, it would be well justified by the disregard of the ultimatum. But Sarkozy, who can count on the CIA and Gladio network to commit this kind of horror on our soil can also play the savior, like Chirac in 1986 with the hostages in Lebanon. Two French members of an NGO operating in Afghanistan are threatened with being beheaded by their captors if France did not withdraw its troops within a week . A timely release by a joint Franco-American between the two towers would, no doubt, to glorify Nicolas Sarkozy may well highlight international credibility and effective fight against terrorism. In short, these are only hypotheses, but certainly ...

What is certain is that we must be totally stupid or death threats to vote Sarkozy. Bush has succeeded in being elected in 2000 and 2004 through rigged electronic voting machines. In France fortunately, electronic voting will be marginal, so no cheating possible in the final results. There is hope ...

Orange, oh hopes

In fact, the vote Sarkozy will be conditioned by the right-wing voters who realize risk that Sarkozy embodies democracy will turn to the tone below, ie mol-Bay. Bayrou, who has adopted the emblematic colors of the Orange Revolution (Ukraine, etc..), Said the center but the center is right, he is right. The problem perhaps is that the program Bayrou is more left than Ségolène Royal. We can therefore suggest that anti-socialos Royal Bayrou vote as called traitors Rocard and Kouchner Allègre (close Jospin) who, himself, has joined the rebel outright Bearn.

Bayrou could really spring a surprise. With his loser image, it has a lot of credit in the suburbs dropped. He managed to dredge ecologists tend Hulot (those on the right, whatever). His argument carries rally because he types on both the UMP on the PS he accused of having blocked the change that now everyone is claiming. He therefore proposed a kind of peace of the brave, where everyone would join and would not even have a way forward for common joy and hope. It's beautiful like John Paul II or Benedict XVI. Amen!

Messiah? But uh

Bayrou President? Ugh, no one believes (Jesus Mary Joseph) but little sheep notes? Finally, is the least worst. OK, it is liberal, he frequents shady environments well known as the conspiracy Trilateral Commission, he is Catholic (as Sarko and Sego), he believes he is a farmer because he knows how to drive a tractor It is Atlanticist (like others), it has racehorses (which won her a lot). But other than that, it is quite common. In addition, it is the corner is a Aquitaine.

His program tote dizzy, not less than 18 themes developed with interesting ideas. But from theory to practice, eh, there's often a gap we try to fill in the next election due by promising change, the real.

In fact, Bayrou is still a danger to democracy, at least in its pluralistic dimension. Indeed, if he wins, he could be a sprawling liberal party that obscures all other parties not affiliated with this ideology. The single thought that cleaves paradoxically become dominant. This would allow another side to the anti-liberals to recompose also united in pole, then louder and more audible now, that for once giving new impetus to political life and new hope for a better world for the losers of the neoliberal capitalist farce.

And me in all this?

For the first time in my life, I will not vote. Every time we made the same move that voting can change lives. Locally, I agree. At the national level, it is a masquerade, a holdup. This only serves to legitimize a person and / or camp. In 2002, the French believed in change, the government of national unity as we sell today Francois Bayrou. We saw the result. Why would this suddenly different? For this it would have had to change the operating rules of the Republic who go in a more democratic (prohibition of multiple directorships in number and in time, proportional, repeal of the Senate, increasing the powers of parliament and weakened the powers of the President, etc..). The opposite happened. Everything is locked and it is always the same ones who benefit. I do not see how you could reverse things with the current leading contenders despite campaign promises.

But not voting is not an act of abandonment of my civic duty. On the contrary. I want to get involved. And begin at the local level. How many of us follow what is decided in the council Municipal our county, the council, regional council? Personally, I am making this effort by reading the papers and proceedings published, wherever appropriate, on the websites of local authorities concerned. But I've never attended a counseling session. I decided to do it now. And to report in this blog. Before I get one day as a candidate in an election.

My slogan policy back to the politicians!

meantime, your comments on the results of the 1st round ...

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Womens Boobs In Saree

Pate presidential campaign, 2007 - Place your bets, games are made (Part 1)


Intro overall

Only a few days before the event. Candidates are excited and throw their last trump cards in the coming battle. A battle for the summit, to be first of all the French. And for the more ambitious, all shots are allowed, preferably low. To collect the most votes, he must know how to play of seduction and demagogy. Everyone has their own "voting". Vote for me and I promise you change:

- Sarkozy launches in early January " I changed" without specifying what ...
- the slogan of Ségolène Royal begins: "With you , change. True"
- in its program, Bayrou himself as " the candidate who can bring real change in French politics .

Everyone wants change. Who is against? Given the precarious situation that has become the norm in our country, apart from the bourgeoisie (small and large) which is enriched on the backs of workers through dividends on the shares it owns in the CAC 40 companies, everyone hope that this exchange in his favor. The real change today is through revolution. Ideas, authority, social representations, attitudes, generations and especially that of the sixty-eighters, arrogant, petty bourgeois who became the real destroyers of the Republic and its humanistic values and hope. If Sarkozy, Royal and Bayrou were just teenagers in 1968, they are all the same products. Can we believe their desires and / or desire for change?

can strongly doubt it. Firstly because they have in common, except to pay all three ISF, belief in growth, they say the only way to reduce unemployment and boost social mobility. This credo has been there over 20 years and we saw the result. The increase in wealth has not benefited everyone and has instead increased inequality and waste, calling into question not only our social model but also the democratic principles of representation and control. Today is a financial oligarchy allied to a nomenklatura intellectual, media and politics who is to sack the company and the planet. Sarkozy, Royal and Bayrou are of course part and despite their speeches pink does give absolutely no means to tackle the world's masters who impose their diktat to all of society. The analysis of (the emptiness) is quite illuminating their programs on their real intentions to change society. As

Coluche said in his skit on the Arab philosopher " Ahmed, he always says change c'i li li z'arabes when you take a ride. It is not arrived but the poor guy! " We either.

Given the personality of the last candidates, I scan them one by one. To start with, honor women with one that gets Queen President: Segolene Royal.

Knock, knock, that's a poll

Le Pen saw already a candidate in 2005. I was in March 2004 (evidenced by a mail). Seeing? Not at all. Nose rather hollow. At that time, France Inter is a survey commented on the idea of a woman candidate in the next presidential election is Ségolène Royal who arrived first. This type of survey relayed by a radio is never trivial: it is a preparation of mind, the beginning of launching a marketing campaign around a new concept in France, a woman president. In a party dominated by a fratricidal war of currents and very little open to women, this idea was not a foregone conclusion. She was even bold. To impose it, we applied exactly the same strategy when launching a new product on the market. As they say in reporting to the glory of big business on M6, "see how!"

Enchanted Ségolène ...


Daughter of a large family and soldiers (including his famous brother who helped the poor shipping Rainbow Warrior), Ségolène was born in Dakar on 22 September 1953 and is bred in the rigorous moral and already the idea the right order. Brilliant student, she makes the NAS where it meets the chubby and bespectacled Francis whom she falls madly in love with as a result 4 kids, she proudly holds up today as a model mother (Hum. ..). At the time, Segolene is already very serious and pointed out by (the inevitable) Jacques Attali who hired him as technical advisor to the Secretariat General of the Elysee Palace from 1982 to 1988. Mitterrand, who is not indifferent to its charms the parachute in the Two Goats where she was elected MP in 1988 narrowly. Ségolène then takes the elevator office: Environment Minister in 1992, a lawyer (well, as Sarko) in 1994, Minister for School Education from 1997 to 2000, Minister of the Family from 2000 to 2002, President Poitou-Charentes in 2004. In fact, any part of this last event. A woman president of region is not trivial (though there have been a previous in the person of Marie-Christine Blandin , President Green in the Nord-Pas-de-Calais from 1992 to 1998 and who it's fun, was born the same day as one year nearly Ségolène) and it deserves to be exploited.

The woman who falls in peak


So it was from 2004 that Segolene will (do) form an image of presidential candidate at the top management, that is to say the Elysee. The strategy: show the maximum consensus and not get too involved where it heats. Example: During the campaign for a referendum on the ECT, Segolene is discreet. Similarly, the Congress Socialist Party of Le Mans, she is careful not to get too far ahead. As they say in Le Monde , the newspaper of reverence (to Sarkozy), "she cultivates an image of a candidate over the party apparatus." And it starts to pay. A survey in 2005 gave the first among the presidential candidates socialists. The seed is sown, it will be enough to water it a little, a lot, passionately, madly ... Royal

The machine is started and nothing will stop it. On the occasion of the CPE crisis in 2006, Ségolène attempts a takeover bid by youth peopolisation media with showbiz stars Jamel Debbouze as or Diam's . It was on a television (the show Le Grand Journal on Canal +) it talks about his possible candidacy for the nomination. Ségolène loves the media and being photographed and filmed, with his children and their birth, in a bikini on the beach ... She plays on the side "look how beautiful I am and yet I have over 50 years." Internet users have given him a name fairly well found, "the lady with the camera." But in its marketing strategy, Segolene - or rather his communications advisor Rastoin Nathalie, France CEO of Ogilvy & Mather, 2nd Global advertising group - not only to promote the package, including the dress code (most often dressed in white, symbol purity, but also blue and red to remind the national flag, and finally black leather when she addresses of youth). It also innovates by reestablishing ties with the grassroots of the socialist party and its famous "participatory democracy". Exit meetings, place in direct contact, the "one-woman show. In the process, she launched her slogan: "Desires for the Future". This does not mean much, except if one is suicidal, but it is consensual. Relying on the Internet and his son Thomas to spread the good word and invite users to build his program with it (the " ségosphère "), it attracts new members to the Socialist Party with the attractive price of 20 Euro (as Prem's ticket to the SNCF, non-exchangeable and non refundable). Other candidates for the nomination (Fabius and Strauss-Kahn) is dumped and will eat it raw in the voting activists who do not respect the instructions of their leaders.

The peace of the brave (itude)

Just elected to the application official, Ségolène Royal is experiencing a blip and is mocked every time she opens her mouth (particularly following his famous pseudo-dumpling "bravitudienne). Supported by a majority of activists, it is isolated by the chiefs of the PS who still hold power and seek to monetize it. So, after formed a campaign team focused around new personalities such as uncontrollable and facetious Arnaud Montebourg , she is forced to finally open the elephants working since its "Presidential Pact". Clearly, it takes the same and is repeated, except the gondola changing. Therefore, desires for the future become more blurred, sweetened with the proposals of the militants. His program is a distressing banality.

Workers, workers, job

The first measure of Segolene Royal should be good at any self-respecting liberal "restore growth to all work." The reduction of working time? A measure of lazy, as if the division of labor (like the 35h) had helped create jobs and more importantly was worth left! No, but it will not mind! The Socialist Party, or rather the Liberal Left or rather the Social Democratic Party, has ranked the dogma of the growth of wealth to overcome unemployment and eventually absorb the public debt which represents the second state expenditure after education. She cites as support for businesses that create jobs. By cons, nothing about the officials ... Not in December, it is where socialism is? And it's not finished: nothing on the fight against flexibility, a source of insecurity. On the contrary, Segolene advocates "give: no handouts but rights and duties" and "labor value by security for employees and the end of the precariousness (Sic). "Translation: in the Anglo-Saxon, it's called" flex security. "Use disposable, short-lived but ASSEDIC guarantees and social protection to survive. Ouaaaaaais! Young people will do-a-rer and then it has another face that the CPE. All this packaged with the "desire for the future," frankly we can only kiffer serious!

Sub, upside down


It is unclear if Ségolène wants to raise taxes but at least she wants to give more money to fight against the "living" (it feels like home Intermarché ) revalue pensions (the vote's that old), construct 120 000 housing units per year (less than 1 million Arlette but given the shortage of manpower in the building, will have to appeal to immigrants, with or without paper), fund research (will have to give much to avoid the ongoing privatization). For debt, we will see later (better not make any promises ...).

Echo-Logic


Where Segolene Royal is strong, that it is both more growth and the "Environmental Excellence". Frankly, it does not mean much because the ecological emergency is incompatible with the growth of production. In fact, if I read between the lines, the queen of Poitou wants to develop an economy based on sustainable development with jobs derived from activities related to it (what she calls "eco-industry") but without calling into question the traditional development based on waste of resources and environmental destruction. Two parallel development models that echo without mixing. Another measure consensual!

Just a little order

In this context, the fight against crime is also consensual and wants to tell all well-gnan gnan. It says so in his book Propaganda, attention Prepare your handkerchiefs: "I want to achieve for every child born here, what I wanted for my own children." This beautiful lyrical has moved Truffart Christiane, 74, who adds: "[Ségolène] is firm with those who do not respect the rule, but at the same time it gives everyone a chance" for example through the "development of educational centers enhanced ", translate military camps or clubs Med recovery 'but only for well-typed Mediterranean ... And yet, it's nothing compared to what we prepare Nicolas W. Sarkozy.

Vive la France libre! (Nah, just kidding)


Not content to give us the desires of the future, Segolene Royal wants to make us stronger and in particular to free ourselves from the military protection of NATO. Finally, it does not say it like that is more subtle because of course talking about the link between Europe and NATO. In any case, it differs from Sarkozy, who claims his devotion to his Atlanticism therefore the United States. In fact, I have a big doubt about the sincerity of this statement vis-à-vis NATO as François Hollande and Arnaud Montebourg, watch the guys it's heavy, are members of a foundation Franco American called "French American Foundation " which aims form of Young Global Leaders ", heralds of the entente cordiale between France and the United States. Like that nothing really bad. Except that passed through the organization of people who a priori should not have much in common (politicians right and left, for example) and receiving training from a few masters of the world as David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger. What then went to Montebourg (2000) and Holland (1996) to the SE where there are also big names in finance, industry and media? Build networks without doubt. But when Ségolène said "I'm not tied to any power of money, no lobby, any interest group, [...], I am a free woman ", should we believe her? If the rigor that is true to herself, it is much less for those around him ... In these conditions, we can understand his reluctance to want the 6th Republic and even the concessions accepted by Montebourg its original sponsor.

Desire coming


Segolene Royal wants to "save France." The opposite would have been surprising. But like all the others, she first wants to win for herself. In Ségolène, there is "ego" and his is well established. It highlights her sex swing (not beaten) to renew the policy in France like Michelle Bachelet (is supposed to have done) in Chile. Admittedly, this is a valid and interesting argument. But what is politics? What I removed from the program does not lead me to a lot of desire, and no future with this lady.

But the worst part is that this is not the worst. The bitterness seeps other. The following

tomorrow ...

Sunday, April 1, 2007

Free Online Kundali Matching

Pate presidential campaign, 2007 - Viva la revolufion!

After the far-right, extreme left. Five vying for our headliners votes: Arlette Laguillier the eternal, the little kid who goes Olivier Besancenot, the coconut-lab not very cheerful Marie-George Buffet the debonair rebellious Jose Bove and the unknown service, Gérard Schivardi. Champions of the anti-liberal, they are lashing (normal) on the ravages of capitalism and unregulated economic globalization. The arguments vary from one candidate to another and they meet on the contextual analysis, they differ not so much on the responses to on how to contribute. Soon the revolution? It is not won ...

Arlette soon Malibu

former employee of Credit Lyonnais, Arlette Laguillier, 67, has probably fought more than really worked. Representing "the camp of the Workers', it is presented to the 6th and final time in the presidential election after his two good scores in 1995 (5.2%) and 2002 (5.7%). It has become so inescapable, a character that nobody really listens to what she says. His immutability, both by its presence only by the content of his speech made it popular beyond its own sphere Elections (sung by starisée Souchon and its puppet Puppets). His party, Workers Struggle, which is one of the founders in 1968, remains obscure structure headed by Robert Barcia, "said Hardy, a businessman allegedly linked to the pharmaceutical industry. This will write a book telling the story of workers' struggles.

As for the FN embodied by its founder, Workers Struggle is Arlette and maintains itself and still the mystery OL choosing not reveal his campaign team. Viscerally anti-capitalist, it presents itself as the only true communist, accused (rightly) the PCF to "manage capitalism," which by participating in socialist governments had lost his revolutionary soul and legitimized decisions far removed from its ideology (eg privatization Air France by Gayssot).

The problem of LO and Arlette Laguillier is to persuade "workers" that Communism is not dead and that voting for the National Front, which has captivated the electorate workers and employees is not a small good solution. But today, its main competitor is Olivier Besancenot with whom she refused to ally themselves while their ideological differences are slim, which created a somewhat confusing which could be fatal to both. Deeply

retirement for Arlette in sunny Malibu!

The postman always rings twice

It became a celebrity, too. Olivier Besancenot, 32 years and once again the youngest elected, piles up again by going after the president noticed a score of 4.25% in 2002. He holds an MA in contemporary history, he chose factor, a profession of letters ... Engaged in Neuilly, the richest city in France and directed by Nicolas Sarkozy some, it is more easily mediated. Young, intelligent, speaking well and what does no harm to our company image, handsome, Olivier could only please. First his party, the Communist Revolutionary League and his mentor, Alain Krivine, who sees in him a way to revitalize a party to the controversial image. And young people fascinated by Che Guevara whose claims to Besancenot and his libertarian side. As Arlette, he knows just talk but she knows better communicate in the media, which earned him move steadily on Canal + zapping through small coups often prepared in advance. As

LO, LCR government denies any alliance with the Socialist Party. This strategy of "independence" may not have the same response in 2002 when the lessons of the scattered voices socialists to "small" left-wing candidates have probably been deductions. On the other hand, is the only way to LCR to continue to exist, unlike the choices made by the PCF and the Greens by displaying their desire to participate in a socialist government, run the risk of being totally atomized .

Cold Buffet

After the defeat of Robert Hue in 2002 and 3.4%, CPF continues his business of self-programmed demolition. The boost will come there Marie-George Buffet, 57, candidate for 2007? The political career of the lady is quite banal history student, she joined the Communist Party in 1969 and the national office of the UNEF. She works a little as joint secretary and was quickly hired by the party as secretary of the Federation des Hauts-de-Seine. Elected in 1977 as deputy mayor of Chatenay-Malabry (92), it is pointed out by Bob (Hue coconut), which has returned to the Central Committee and the national office in 1987. Barely elected member of 9-3 in 1997, she joined the government of Jospin as ministresse Youth and Sports and is known by his pseudo-fight against doping and most enjoy the victory of the soccer players in 1998 for the Cup World which she oversees the proceedings. In 2001, she became the patron of the PCF and leaves Bob, his former mentor, go-pipe breaks in the presidential election 2002.

Marie-George is a clever. She understood that communism alone would not produce anything. After collaborating with the Socialists for 5 years and the disastrous election result of 2002, we had to change the image of the PC. She then turned to the activist community (movement of unemployed people, defending the right of asylum, DAL, etc..) And played the opening with other leftist parties. In the referendum on the ECT, it funded rallies unit allowing the anti-liberal left to speak with one voice. The victory pushed not to repeat this strategy for the presidential campaign. Except she took her former partners for simpletons who wanted to compete well in its slot and support but not his leadership. Result: the Marie-George Buffet may be very cold on April 22 ...

Gentil poppy

is the symbol chosen by José Bové to campaign because it is a flower, so innocent, and especially a marker of pollution. A sort of tackle the Greens and their sunflower. The entry of José Bové in the campaign is not trivial. After the successful campaign of "anti-liberal" against non-TCE, the political power struggles have torn hopes for a unitary candidate in the presidential election, with each side trying to pull the cover toward you. It took the launch of an online petition and collection of 40,000 signatures in two weeks asking Bové to appear on behalf of the alter-globalization so that the latter agrees, stating that "it was long ago that he itched in the abdomen "... Especially its possible imprisonment after his conviction for mowing GMO corn laid on him the media spotlight who have served more than served.

Me, I like Jose. It was first points in common: he lived in Talence where he was born elsewhere and Bazas where he was hidden by friends to escape military service. It has a nice mouth, he says what he thinks (or almost ...), it is kind, funny, true green and unlike Voynet, he did not want to join the PS for a slice officer or elected officials. In addition, he is the only candidate fluent in English and English, is a true internationalist, or as they say "a world citizen." Even if you do not hear much about him in the media except to Topic court, his hearing is real, especially among left intellectuals, teachers, ecologists "nay-sayers" of TCE but also among many precarious young and old. The problem for Bove, is that it came a little late in this campaign and as his program that his ideas are quite messy. Just like his campaign dominated by amateurism, notably in the organization of its meetings (I saw one to piss of laughter on the parliamentary channel which I just find the video for the set line: it is filmed by a cameraman parkinsonnien, the microphones do not work, the sense projo illuminate the scene is so powerful that it blinds everyone Groland Brief ...)

With Schivardi, it shits of course!

You do not know? Me either. No need to be spread over too good man, Mayor Mailhac, a rural town of Minervois and candidate of the Workers' Party , the party that has been the object of suspicion, especially when Lionel Jospin, in 2001, denied any relationship with this organization that he has nevertheless been a member in his youth (I must say that the Workers' Party itself is a bit complicated to understand is broken into several streams).

The face of alcohol in his accent and Schivardi roccailleux lunch frankly make no endorsement for the city, unlike his campaign manager, Daniel Gluckstein , who himself had introduced in 2002. Former member of the PS, he was elected General Counsel of the Aude in 2001 against the official candidate of the PS and cons "intercommunal forced", accused of losing their independence to small municipalities. Defining itself as the representative of the Mayors of France, he had to change his slogan and posters following the legitimate complaint of the Association of Mayors of France. His campaign motto: Europe, France's gravedigger. A sovereignist left defender of public services and rurality. In this context, its main competitor is the movement Hunting, Fishing, Nature and Traditions ideological background but with a much more assertive (Hunters must regret the cheekiness of Bearn Jean Saint-Josse and the pallid Frederick Hihous risk to fish far fewer votes than his predecessor).

At your Che!

Apart Bové who might get the best out of the game, other anti-liberal candidates will be picked up. France is a country long considered too conservative for a revolution. Ultimately, velvet, as in the countries of Eastern Europe (where the CIA has funded and supported the anti-communist movement to overthrow the dictatorial political regimes in place). A candidate is now clearly positioned in this niche. It's called "Gay Ernesto Bayrou" and he advocated "quiet revolution", after no doubt that Sarkozy has abandoned his first campaign slogan "tranquil rupture" (append two words in the opposite direction, it's called an oxymoron
). Bayrou is it the French Gandhi? Answer in the next block also campaigned to end this show stars politic Sarko-cowboy and Segovia GoGirl ! Come!

Sunday, March 11, 2007

Installing Mikomi Webcam

Pate presidential campaign, 2007 - France in black and (mostly) white

Fear on France

April 21, 2002. Can not forget this date. It is a thunderbolt: Jean-Marie Le Pen is found in the second round of presidential elections against Jacques Chirac. France has fear. Or rather "it" asks us to fear and "to block" the National Front by voting massively for the self-proclaimed representative of the Republican right represented by Chirac, reluctant hero. At the initiative of the Left and particularly the Socialist Party, huge demonstrations were held throughout France to strike awareness about the danger "fascist" Le Pen, with 17% of voters, would threaten the country. We know the outcome of this manipulation of crowds. Chirac was elected with 82% of the vote and while we waited for a government coalition to resolder around the country who had republican values and increased again in power, Chirac appointed him as incompetent as Prime Minister in the person of Raffarin (no longer zero, you die), which formed a government entrenched right. In legislative elections that followed, the FN only obtained more than 11% of the vote and no member.

Hands off my post

Le Pen was really a danger? Le Pen is an outstanding politician, an orator who master the French language as a person and has a great culture. In this he is charismatic and no doubt when it will disappear from the political scene, that is to say soon, he embodies the National Front on its own sink. It is no coincidence that as Laguiller for Workers Struggle, he ran again for president. He is the only one who can win and collect as much as the master on board the "Ship" (name of head of the Front National). The Traitor "Megret" who had attempted a coup by establishing the NRM could only see his inability to play the nationalist leaders and had to be resolved after much judicial convictions in its management of the City of Vitrolles regain the household gods of the FN , hoping, no doubt, become caliph instead of the caliph.

Invoice fracture

The FN's electoral base is known. Apart from a core of nationalist nostalgia of Petain, the FN has imposed especially in the lower classes who felt abandoned by the left and policies favoring capital at the expense of wages and employment. Globalization, the principles of subsidiarity of Europe on national laws and the adoption of the euro have been experienced as acts of treason by the working people and peasants who took the brunt of economic deregulation and financial delivery relevant social rights. Unemployment, poverty are the consequences and deal with the complicity of the ruling parties to maintain the "social fracture" to quote the good doctor Chirac, the National Front, though very liberal (through the dismantling of public services such ), had no trouble seducing the weakest among them and some neu-neus francs (see
this sequence of zapping minute 1:54 ), condemning the "all rotten" (unfortunately often based) of the ruling political class and by designating a guilty fantasy embodied by the immigrant who plunder unduly the country (allowances, reserved housing, free health care, etc..) Brussels as Europe's plunder our sovereignty by its unjust laws. The result was the slogan "French first", admittedly simplistic but effective as easy to understand and identify with.

Finally, as all parties on the extremes of the political map, the FN also drew the protest vote for people instead of left. This was the case in 2002, it will also be this year. Some like Dieudonne (whoo,
the ugly nasty antisemitic !) Have suggested that a massive vote in favor of Le Pen could help explode the system ( Dieudonne vote Bové 1st Round but did not say no to a vote if Le Pen in the second round ...) to build a new republic .

zozo The Zoo

The FN is perhaps his political base but fear today is not that of a major party. Since 2002, he has no parliamentary except 5 MEPs (including Le Pen himself). It does not control any area, no department, no intercommunal structure, only two towns of modest size (Orange, 30000 residents, led by the villain Jacques Bompard now close to De Villiers and Chauffailles, megalopolis of 4500 inhabitants situated
Saône-et-Loire ...). This was not however the case in the past.

Established in 1972, the National Front of small groups remained until 1981, the date from which François Mitterrand, then President of the Republic, will exploit Jean-Marie Le Pen for electoral purposes. To better do exist, he mediates and asks Julien Dray, then head of the UNEF student union (submarine of the Socialist Party), to create a large youth movement on a unifying theme easily. The association SOS Racism was born and with it, the National Front has never been worn as well and was able to spread its ideas "humanist" on immigrants from poor countries (Africa, Middle East and Eastern Europe, east) from other rightist parties government. It will be remembered as the famous phrase Chirac on
noise and smells of foreign pronounced in 1991. The same list of agreements signed between the RPR and the UDF (Bayrou remember it?) With the National Front in regional elections in 1986 and then management agreements in 1998 to direct regional councils and especially (Languedoc-Roussillon, PACA, Lorraine, Picardy). In his farewell speech (sniff) Chirac (not afraid) who said "love France and the French," has cracked a warning against "the poison of extremism, xenophobia and anti-Semitism. " Inflated ... but 100% of Chirac. These alliances

Right "Republican" with the FN trivialize the ideas of the latter. Today, under the leadership of Nicolas Sarkozy, the ex-RPR became UMP no longer afraid to show common values with the FN and therefore dredging without complex part of his electorate. It now calls easier Jean-Marie Le Pen (and also his daughter, natural runner) do zozo on television shows, as if finally he was part of the zoo policy in which he built his cage. The game is totally hypocritical because we do not know if this is the FN or dessert. On the one hand, Jean-Marie Le Pen can not get (like every time he sits) the 500 referrals (fortunately Sarkozy promised to help to show voters tempted by the FN between him and Le Pen, one could hear) and the other, he is credited with 15% of the vote, as in 2002 ... History repeating itself ?


Again, the major parties and the media are subservient to them (that is to say almost all) replay to scare us to better focus our vote (the famous vote "useful") . The FN is an adjustable variable that is used by electors to suit their interests UMP and PS. In these circumstances, everything will be done for the power he has never said otherwise or that the political and institutional system remains unchanged, anti-democratic. I said, just in case, I am not here advocating the National Front, with whom I do not feel the slightest ideological affinity, or share the tastes and colors (or rather its absence). It's just an observation and reasoning regarding the confiscation of power by the tandem-UMP SP applies to all other parties, including the pro-revolutionary Che-Gay Bayrou (I will return the ticket that will be spent).

Viscount is good

Little separates the FN enemy of his brother, the Movement for France in 1994 created and directed by - inspire a great shot - Viscount Philippe Le
Pretty Villiers de Saintignon (... in your mouth). However, unlike Jean-Marie Le Pen, De Villiers combines political mandates. Elected member of the National Assembly from the 1st round since 1988 and since that year, President of the General Council of Vendée he considers his kingdom, De Villiers has also since 2004 Member of European Parliament (he gave up his seat in the National Assembly because of multiple directorships). His political career between right-wing parties (including UDF) and alongside some sulphurous figures (including Charles Pasqua, with whom he created the RPF in 1999) enabled him to build a political base and electoral enough to play in the yard old. Today, despite 2% of its voting intentions, he had no trouble gathering the 500 referrals for its candidacy for president.

Posing as the defender of France that works, Philippe de Villiers takes much of its popularity to the success of local entertainment and theme park of Puy du Fou (1 million visitors per year) he created and directs it masterfully by providing a self-financing. A case in which he boasts to attract the employers and the media ...

The pile of Fu cons Allah

display religious Philippe de Villiers is a secret. Opus Dei Catholic Christian tendency, he praises the moral values of the Church in France and had proposed during the drafting of the EU Constitutional Treaty to include a reference to Christianity. This explains, in addition to its homophobia (sketched by Guignols de l'Info) his Islamophobia.

De Villiers leads in fact a personal struggle against the Muslim religion considers it incompatible with the Republic. Also, he stigmatizes permanently Muslims - who have the misfortune to live outside of the city (etymological meaning of the "suburbs") and in the margins of society (welfare, black market trafficking of all kinds) - that amalgam of "Islamic terrorists", which represent a threat to stablity of our country. His hatred reached its climax when he denounced the so-called infitration of Islamist Roissy . As a precautionary measure, baggage handlers were transferred for no other reason than being Muslim. De Villiers has made a book that serves today's electoral pitch differentiation. To learn more about his speech trendy for adhering to the neo-conservative American clash of civilizations , I suggest you watch this exchange (18 min) it had with Tariq Ramadan (an internationally recognized theologian, except in France ...) as part of the program " Responses " Serge Moati on France 5.

Philippe de Villiers, even more assertive than Le Pen, thus defends the real France. One to which everyone should convert. And if this is not the case, one is entitled to his refrain: "France, love it here otherwise leave it there. "This phrase was taken over (?) by Nicolas Sarkozy, the new herald of the uninhibited right. What has not sit well with everyone in the UMP, although it must admit, the opponents are rather quiet, except a , an Islamist sympathizer probably ...

beautiful white hat and white nose

If Le Pen vote touched me one time in the revolutionary logic enacted by Dieudonné (My guru subversively), I did not commit. I vote for people who offer me an ideal society in which I acknowledge and for which I give a discharge for them to implement. I'm not even using weapons of enemies to eliminate other enemies in the optical "destroy evil with evil." I still have to convince to apply this dialectical choice. So no regrets between Jean-Marie and Philip, my nose will smell other scents.

continued ...

the occasion of my next pie campaign president, I will propose a big jump in the big night with Arlette, Oliver and Jose, if that does not cancel at the last moment ... And all this in a homely!


Thursday, March 1, 2007

Watch Online Bangbros Com

Pate presidential campaign 2007 - Voynet, the Greens and other alcolos, uh no, ecologists


Because of Hulot and his Ecological Pact, parties representing the case are on track to take a nice branloute (contraction of frigged and rout ). The polls, even if they are to be taken lightly, are quite impressive: Voynet (Greens) is credited January-February% of voting intentions, Lepage (Cap 21) flirt bar, 1%, France Gamerre (Generation Ecology) is close to zero points. Ouaiiiiis! If our candidates already attempted - where are the men? - Can happen to appear ... When we know the interest shown by the French with respect to the environmental cause, at least in investigating the matter, one can ask some questions about the credibility and representativeness of the environmental movement in France.

In search of the new star

Before it takes his decision not to be a candidate, but even after much delay to assess its real popularity, TV star Nicolas Hulot could boast of more than 10% of voting intentions. Its mediation through its eco-visual show cult "or Ouch Ouch Oh" and its political virginity (apart from regular attendance and not very well received by Chirac aka Super-Eco ) made him very attractive in the eyes of public opinion seduced by the side of good-natured character (a sort of modern Tintin) and its sincere commitment to environmental causes. By withdrawing from the Elysian race, he left a great void that rushed to occupy Favorites polls, all committed through their program, in which " environmental excellence " (Royal), in which " the green revolution "(Sarkozy), in which" the future of our children (Bayrou). The Voynet and others today have more than their eyes to weep at this tsunami of green tinted opportunist that has engulfed what was their traditional goodwill.

This saddens me. For over 10 years I vote for the Greens because they personified (ed) so the closest my thinking and my lifestyle. But in this election, I'll dig elsewhere.

With Voynet, we see no net

Above all, I do not map with Voynet . Yet it has many qualities: hardworking, serious (too much), sincere, courageous, combative. His passage to the Ministry of Environment under the age Jospin has left a bitter taste of solitude whenever she was taking shots (and they were numerous as she tells on the show web citizen today must the Politicshow ). Since she became more surly, brittle, fragile to hide a real inner change its look repeatedly betrayed. And then she adopted a logical business policy by choosing to sit in the Senate, an institution that denounces also ...

His attitude is paradoxical. It tackles the PS while making eyes at him for agreements in the forthcoming election. It would be another party, I would say that would be commonplace and the game is very naively, I thought that the Greens could be different. We must believe that for the majority of them, this is not the case.

So their strategy choices in the referendum on the EU Constitutional Treaty. They voted in internal and campaigned for the "yes" when that text was, for me, not compatible with the simple idea that I was a constitution for democratic, social and just ... what it takes to live well together. I do not understand how the Greens have accepted Part III of the Treaty which established the rules of the economic game, which had absolutely nothing to do there. So if the Greens, whose Voynet, have accepted this type concession, so they are willing to kowtow to other subjects in exchange for seats elected (with the Socialists) and satisfy the egos of those who have invested in politics and politician.

Nique Mamère

My disaffection for the Greens has been recently reinforced by the attitude of Christmas Mamère, prompted the issuance of Karl Zero. Small reminder of the facts for those who have missed: filmed his arrival and without his knowledge down to a Citroen C5 - probably diesel - driven by a chauffeur, no air Mamelle not hesitate to confide that having no car in Paris for over 20 years, he came by bicycle and it has formed! Caught in a lie! And he gave it a few days later in the broadcast Pascale Clark " Aside " on Canal + where, instead of making amends, he persists and signs saying he was trapped, so he has, mwarf rather self-trapped ! Mamère visibly differs more in the egology in ecology! During his interview by Karl Zero, he also had a reaction very jargon vis-à-vis a issue of Internet on actual or perceived membership in Freemasonry. Fear once again to dent his image, he, the former journalist and television communication doctor ?

This pitiful example shows that the Greens and the leaders are a political party like any other and although they are more democratic than others in their internal operations, they can not avoid the personal ambitions of the race for power and intrigue clan that pepper the lives of 8000 members. An example among many of these struggles for leadership: Saturday March 1st at the meeting of Voynet in Montpellier, the room applauded his candidate and wisely made a triumphant Christmas Mamère during his speech support, which is behind the scenes has not bothered to break it by predicting "a slap
monumental . Team spirit!

The end of an errant myth?

To believe that, ultimately, the ecology can be carried by a political movement but must remain in the citizen sphere, acting as local partners and groups national and international pressure. May also lack the political ecology of a charismatic leader who could unite under his name all those who are sensitive to the sustainable development of our planet. Hulot has shown that hope but his political legitimacy was challenged by the so-called environmental movement a-political (left). Who then to replace it? I think it is clear a priori, no one.

So, dear representatives of the environmental issue to the highest office, do not expect me to come and slide with your name on my ballot in the ballot box on April 22. But for other dates election, everything is green or because programs that are presented seem interesting nonetheless.

continued ...

My next block presidential campaign with a good pen white and beur without , as guests will be Jean-Marie and Philippe. Sharpen your knives!



Thursday, February 22, 2007

Pokemon Deluge Splash Damage

Pate presidential campaign 2007 - Commissioning appetite

According to a recent poll that I can not find references, 79% of French people do not know who to vote for the occasion the presidential election this year 2007. It pretends to be surprised when it is always the same thing. Disillusionment following the unfulfilled promises of the candidates elected and suspicions on the promises made by the current contenders raise a legitimate fear on the part of voters. To explain this confusion, a little critical analysis of our political system is needed.

The presidential system sought by General de Gaulle (one senior military so) with the Constitution of the 5th Republic (custom written by his aide Michel Debre) was (and is always) a soft dictatorship where the principle of universal suffrage election of the President of the Republic gave the illusion of a modern democracy. But where the President-General gave a few more pledges democratic principles including the use before the French referendum to confirm his political guidelines, his successors have confiscated the power that had given the people by favoring the way government at the expense of Parliament and of the popular consultation. The holdup led to an autocracy that décribilise each day a little more political action and those who are elected officials.
What is the balance after 12 years of Chirac at the Elysee? Zero. What is therefore now the presidential election, except to save the appearances that we are still a democracy?

Unlike other developed countries, the Parliament (National Assembly and Senate) is at best a second thought (there lays sometimes interesting reports) and the worst and unfortunately far too often a recording chamber where the elected representatives, most of jobholders local mandates, manifest their existence by the horns in front of TV cameras sessions on topical issues. If anyone knows her MP and his record, let me know!

Our political system is completely ossified and despite calls from some (Montebourg, Bayrou, Voynet, Buffet, Bové ...) to go to a Sixth Republic, it does not feel a great amenity from the leaders in place and likely future really want to change the rules for fear of opening up the democratic system as it is entitled to expect (" for the people and by the people") and would soon make hurt their career and political career.
However, the crisis in France is not so much economic and institutional: it is because our institutions are weak and our political elites addicted to power and bribes offered to command the economic policy. The famous phrase of Prime Minister Jospin on his powerlessness in the face layoffs at Michelin in 1999 is emblematic of the resignation of policy on economic logic and especially financial.

Globalization (without railings) presented as being in the sense of history and explanation as to the difficulties of exogenous our country is a quibble repeated at will to hide the incompetence of our elected officials and their unwillingness to self-reform. The system benefits few at the expense of all others but it's always others that are being asked to adapt, to make efforts, citing the inaction of the French response to the wonderful world of neo-liberalism , corporatization of public employees, the excess of those lazy civil servants, the refusal to face the sacrifices of joy and happiness of wage flexibility and use disposable only bulwark against relocation, the failure to privatize freely, etc. .

short, the "every man for himself" built into a dogma of political action is the only possible path to the alternative "comply or resign." This view is less shared by a majority of French and mistrust vis-à-vis the current electoral farce could not be more justified.

The politicking has taken precedence over real politics, where the debate took the place of ideological base for discussion and selection of candidates (see the televised confrontations Giscard-Mitterrand). Membership (blind) of the two largest parties that are the PS and UMP capitalist system and liberalism erases the ideological differences. So much so that today it is the form that prevails on the merits to distinguish the different candidates between them and it is sometimes difficult to know who speaks for whom. Thus, when Segolene Royal, Jospin as already in 2002, is reluctant to say that his program is a socialist, you say that the Socialist Party should be renamed "Liberal Left" or as in Germany, "Social Democratic Party."

Given this trend bipartisanship, "small" parties are struggling to exist and coexist. Despite displaying more radical beliefs, they are too numerous to be identified so credible. There are as follows: 4 anti-liberal party (PCF, LCR, LO, Bove and co), 4 green trend (The Greens, Cap 21, MEI, France in action), 2 are shooting the wad on immigrants ( FN, MPF), one who is hunting on all lands (CPNT), excluding the nebula of unknown and wacky as the "fun Party" (sic) headed by a certain Cindy Lee, barbie doll while silicon, especially Front and offering with girlfriends adjust in kind sponsorship of elected officials in his favor!

As usual, the media and their favorite weapon, the poll almost daily, trying to focus the debate on the two headliners that are UMPS Nicolas Sarkozy and Segolene Royal. Except that, seeing the frustration of voters face to ready-to-think proposed Bayrou has prompted in part by playing the card of synthesis right / left, center ball, and dream in the second round outisder or even downright elected (word of the Virgin Mary, dixit Pasqua ...).

My dear readers, citizens, do you take over the head. I'm here. Indeed, I suggest you make a modest contribution by reviewing our candidates so that you can make an informed decision. I warn you right away: I can not be in complete good faith but which will, hopefully, debate.

For my part, I already made my choice but I can not reveal to you that at the end of this blog to block presidential campaign, just before the first round, hey hey hey ...

The first candidate to go to my roping fine meats will be a candidate in the person of Voynet (Greens). He was loudly applauded and is encouraged because she will need it.

A table!