How Can I Use My Jpmiles

OUTRAGE


When indignation is served by the talent, to inspire us.


violence is there. The revolution is to take charge and transform into its opposite. LUXEMBOURG Rosa.

No comments on this topic, thank you

Otterbaysuits Mermaid

ESPERITUDE

anesthesiologist since 1976, and thinking that my opinion may CSMF the interest and some others here:

Sample of CSMF is bogus because it is made by a union that is self-proclaimed defender of a medical profession that it ignores much of problems.
CSMF The same "opponent" is in what we called "the espéritude" not to speak like Ségolène, but to translate this blend of illusions and false hopes that characterize the action of the French medical unions face Social Security into bankruptcy since the early 70

say that 71% of physicians have "good relations" with funds equivalent to saying that 71% of doctors have few dealings with credit unions and does not ask to have them and those who do support them long ago. DOCTORS DO NOT WANT THE FUND OF MEDICINE NOT MORE THAN THE JUSTICE FUND let this be in the ministries and the HAS.

All those who believe, out of respect for their ethics and their ethics, that "Paying Agency" is neither the officer nor care the controller nor the court physician, STAND UP AND BE RESOLVED FIGHT THOSE WHO THINK THE OPPOSITE.

The rest of the blah-blah reported in this survey is to match up the stencil to approximate through the useless or by evidence, while ignoring the number one problem of health in France since THIRTY YEARS: ITS INADEQUATE FUNDING structurally.

The assertion that doctors are in a period of doubt is a step backwards compared to reality ..... doctors have no doubt the inability of the Trust (the only term that smile or cringe as the character) to solve the problems faced by the healthcare system.
say that doctors are TOTALLY HOSTILE TO THE GOVERNMENT AND THE CONVENTIONAL SYSTEM IN WHICH THEY MEET THEIR MOST VAIN HOPES is closer to reality.

In fact, claim that there is only one element to describe relations practitioners and the social security of conventional is pure waffle ...
An agreement is by definition a voluntary process for both parties (the doctors are actually forced into agreement by Tariff Authority) must be an agreement and indenture does not contain clauses potestative (the social security changes the the same rules and laws, according to his whim ...).

say that doctors rely on medical unions in general and in particular CSMF is to practice another form of jargon ... Is to deny the periodic leakage or permanent medical specialists to associations or coordination, and even to new unions as UCDF all created in response to union activity "traditional".

The survey performed in the operating room where I work at least 12 hours per day for over thirty years, shows that the majority of Surgeons and anesthesiologists obstetricians, feel they are not represented by CSMF and the UMESPE, any more than by their unions called vertical.


JFH

Weed Smells Of Oregano

WHY DO WE REFUSE TO GO OUT IN MUTUAL

For the thousandth time to answer the eternal question of monopoly Safely: Putting safety competes with insurers it's nip it in the minds of its defenders, though, if you really thought this might be the solution for a renaissance of true solidarity ...
In fact the social security has no competition in terms of solidarity, it is his mission, and it fills the need it, which does not prevent him from being the most zero insurance.
THE problem is the ideological confusion of its missions of solidarity and insurance.

The ayatollahs of the social security are for universal coverage without means testing for the entire population and to, any disease, generous attitude, certainly, but defeat for at least thirty years by lack of resources and failure to take into account the explosion of the offering and medical demand ... Currently we must admit that the system is being secured to break what he helped build and its solidarity with people who n'enont not need, while leaving an increasing proportion of dying people " without law "(see the Social SAMU).

The French health care system has long been the global model, with its willingness to distribute without parsimony means that he did not.
Medicare has secured itself as an illusion that his deficits were tolerated and / or considered "structural" ... Today its deficits are no longer tolerated, while the population has taken medical consumption habits, consistent with current scientific data, and it benefits from for 20 years longer than when creating the system, if one adds the steadily decreasing dependency ratio, the system's problems fixed, which it refuses to leave, fully explained ... The only question we ask is precisely WHY DO WE REFUSE to leave? And then everyone has a bad answer ... ideological or political ..

The trick is knowing who has the courage to whistle the end of the "recess" as a system multi-billion euro annual deficit is not sustainable, do live "artificially" we will inevitably be a headlong rush to deficits or rationing of care ... Attempts to streamline care by HAS are meritorious and useful, but probably a "cosmetic" effect on deficits ... and unrelated to future challenges of health ... Furthermore, as stated by the President of the HAS itself, rationalization does not mean rationing.
So even if this does not please everyone ... it takes money to health and it will take even more in the future so one must be look where he is ... Uncle Scrooge in mutual insurers and bankers, and not continue to work with Donald Duck Safely, the "lame duck solidarity" and his cronies "mutual fake ass".

MUST MAKE HEALTH RATHER THAN AN HONEST TRADE SCAM pooled, no offense to Mr. Davant who is willing to pay for alternative medicine and recruit suckers to increase the surface area of the vineyard mutual ... Mutuality is in effect a health insurance that sells booze while morality to everyone, this is one reason why doctors dislike with Mr. Davant moderation ...

REALLY SHOULD BE CO-FINANCED BY THE HEALTH COSTS OF THOSE WHO HAVE THE MEANS TO SAVE THE POOR OF SOLIDARITY SECU.

For now, in a frantic desire to maintain the system in the "on" state attempts to manage the shortage STRUCTURAL so increasingly authoritarian ... which of course does is absolutely worthless.
Discussions CON ventional be biased and useless so we will not decide to end the Safely Grandpa.

As many of us think about this list, solidarity is the responsibility of the social security, but jurisdiction over health insurance is "elsewhere".

Voila. (1000 edition)


JFH (I always say the same things because we always writes the same things and have the courtesy to respond).

How To Transfer Saves From Gpsphone To Vba

PIQUE CON-TROL IN

PICNIC IN MUTUAL
Video sent by ucdf

Three major players on the market for complementary Health:
- insurers
-
welfare institutions - mutual
Face insurers, mutual feel much more virtuous. This sense of superiority is justified?
From two TV ads, comparing the practices of insurers and mutuelles.en surgical care.
Union of Surgeons of France, the leading French union surgical

Moun And Blade Seriel

The CSMF stands belatedly an observation that is needed for years. And when she talks back?? of the overall budget, we have fun .. is there ever anything other than block grants for health care costs even if they are unsustainable? Since its inception ONDAM no medical is a farce, systematically undervalued relative to public expectations for health, and without any serious assessment of needs actual funding ... Anyway, this system has inspired collectivist claim to help everyone from cradle to grave, without success, and in which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everyone would be bad even with means;. Besides, it is increasingly ill while being increasingly financially untenable ..

All discussions are called conventional biased Depis thirty years by the political will to maintain health insurance called solidarity on which the French say they are totally PUT tied. The scarcity management and manage the shortage later denounced not CSMF result of this diabolical perseveration


The conventional parts are reduced to managing a shortage created from scratch, not by government but by all governments refuse for thirty years to question our so-called insurance model disease called solidarity and unfunded, WHICH CONTINUES TO WEAR HOT INCREASINGLY HARD to quality care and continues to despair BODY MEDICAL while voting to itself all the virtues .
Until we refuse to admit that the state should not be the insurer of the disease is French and it is high time if we are to continue to be in solidarity with the poor, and diversify expand the resource, it remains problematic in the management of scarcity Good Souls mee socialist and other blind howl at the "privatization" as other wolf howl ... by refusing to admit the failure of their system

is the CSMF unions and other chaperones CON ventional system which inaugurated years ago this approach ENDLESS

The conventional system between liberals and particiens an insurer who merely "tolerate "liberalism in general and specific medical stopped working a long time and it is a bit late to make the statement even if it is accepted that only the idiots who do not change their minds .. .

To solve the problem we always advocate the same revenue as unnecessary and dangerous control of the organization by caregivers Paying by suspicious transfers consisting
pumping money to the lab and radiology for GPs to pass, by the "brainwashing" consisting shouting over the rooftops the gross turnover of surgeons and anesthesiologists who work 12 to 14 hours a day, justifying blockages fee for 15 years, etc. ... None of this constitutes a health policy ... she even encourage students to reasonable dirigier towards non-medical courses and that is what is happening ..

The decline in care, access to specialists has nothing to do with poverty nor with the higher fees ... ophthalmologists, and gynecologists in the same sector have an appointment at 6 months or 1 year and more ... and blocking access to specialists via the doctors cut his victims
PRACTITIONERS HAVE ALL THE ASS FULL OF SOCIAL SECURITY, the brain drain in directions other than medicine and "déplacage" practitioners are installed sanctions INEVITABLE of pseudo health policy reforms and the 21 pseudo sacred cow named safety will require that this should end up being told in high places.
The declining quality of care through some form of de facto demedicalization the country will take a toll that even the official statistics can not hide

LA FRANCE IS NOT A MODEL FOR SEVERAL YEARS IN HEALTH BECAUSE IT DOES NOT GIVE THE MEANS OF FINANCING THE AMBITION
(did she afford it? some claim)
and because it persists in an outdated model of health insurance both expensive and ineffective

Point bar


Dr. JF HUET

Mysore Mallige Mediafire

AMBULATORY SURGERY OR


Our

"thinkers" of the social security (see Principle, Peter ...) have found a new weapon to save the money to the social security it does not, by promoting the surgery "ambulatory" ( PJ see form)
I use that term derisively as you might expect a bit despite the seriousness of the problem, not to mention the danger is to get out of tonsillectomies to please the insurer public and that make me say that we will be dead, whose responsibility we will of course be attributed in spite of the constant incitement to evil that assails us the administrative complications generated by the prior applications arising from those measures with clear financial and medical consequences likely she will succeed in saving this wonderful social acquis appointed solidarity group health insurance or more commonly "Safely" we pride ourselves in chorus with a lot of Coue method? huh? NO Notwithstanding the lost time and cost of undeniable connections with deficient medical con-councils, patients who have dizziness or vomit or bleed in them worse in the street, will they sacrifice their social and civic solidarity to save the wonder and public insurance-named above?

NO ...

However to avoid misunderstandings thanks to controls merdical send us a form to "the reprocessing of a stay in hospital outpatient classic" for cases:
-or patient with a sense of running risks will not come out
-or patient "that is not bad but do not feel well" does not leave
-or patient's family finds "not well" wishes to remain for night ...
-or patient that nurses "can not find much" same-as-our-place-it - hospitalization "is finally convinced that it must remain pure night
-or unforeseen changes in the procedure and / or anesthesia occur during surgery
-or unexpected reactions to anesthesia and / or surgery is occur in post-operative bleeding
unexpected
-knee swelling, which is too bad after arthroscopic
-patient who is unable to fart after a colon and that this concern ..
cardiac-respiratory problems kidneys liver, urinary, cerebrovascular, gastrointestinal, rectal bladder (and in the "gizzard ".).. alleged by the patient as his-or-my-ly due to the intervention and requiring, from his point of view allowed a careful and prolonged monitoring devoted to which they are entitled under taxable status of French social-contributor-and-due-shared (but ha! ...)
-where despite our crass stupidity WE would find useful to hospitalize the patient scheduled for ambulatory whatever prior opinion of the Medical Officer While non-exhaustive list ..? Another form? Other explanatory letter? Discussion of carpet merchants like "I kept it for the night but" I'll do it more promised? "A telephone call to the doctor whenever Council to hospitalize a patient ambulatory?
What? coua? koi?

Dr. JF HUET

Craccare Reason Record Demo

APHORISMS palindrome?

the official feed of the futility of the measures he advocates.

dysorganisation the country's multiplying public employment.

culture of dysfunction is necessary for the exercise of collective incompetence.

administrative failures are job creators, so that more civil servants are inefficient they are more likely to be.

any intelligent and unlikely organizers, who, by definition seek productivity gains in government have a process seen as anti-social ...

Fair or not?
Feedback Hot Thank

JFH