I enjoyed your editorial view of the doctor who focuses on the inadequacy or the existing discrepancy between the private practice of medicine and health care financing system inspired collectivist
That said, why repeat systematically phrases about "the intractable problem of uncontrolled overruns fees" and, on "unequal access to care resulting" ... it sounds like ... Davant
Medical consumption of CMU is really hampered by the higher fees that are, makes such a big deal? the alleged inequality in care through this really exist elsewhere such as in the speeches of politicians misleading and officials from the CNAM, and in speeches full of normative dependence of those who repeat such nonsense? I am but a sector I shows how the strongest of the surgeons sector 2 I work with, policyholders overruns "measured" and does not impose CMU, in particular, and nothing proves that this category of patients would be below the average level of medical consumption ..
Politicians of all stripes feel good to castigate periodic payment to the act, only to find that introducing an element of fee-in salaried physicians would eventually be a good thing to encourage them to work ... In summary: private physicians would act too much because they are paid to act and salaried physicians would not make enough because they are not paid to act ... without comment
The proposal of Professor Vallencien is interesting to determine if its fair value (and how to do) the share of fixed remuneration which we are unable to properly identify the nature and limits enrollment goals .
The problem that is raised is in fact the disappearance of the notion of fees to which replaces each day a little more than fact of salaried physicians by health insurance ...
Clarify concepts before reform would be a first step ...
What is left of liberalism-it medical? Nothing or almost ...
What remains of the cult and priesthood of the quasi-medical hospital employees? Not much to be polite ...
And if two things were related? And if the disappearance of the concept of fees and the concept of dedication were two consequences of the disappearance of medical magisterium?
Both types of physicians, employees and liberals are living longer their worst year ... and if the problem was elsewhere and within the medical profession? On Safely for example in the system and said secured virtually bankrupt for thirty years, which merely "tolerate" liberalism and liberalism in general medical in particular?
Without even mentioning pollution administrative medical thinking and the increasing subordination of doctors to the CNAM ...
Who wants to be a doctor today and why?
Who does not want to be and why?
us answer these questions before considering reform what will eventually become a desert ...
I let you think about that.
Dr. JF HUET