must recognize that the system of financing health expenditure is integral said destroying little by little he had helped build when its deficits were tolerated and considered "structuring"
Contrary to what some people think we should not save Social Security in its current state because it is thirty years since the foundation of ALL the problems we face
Those who saw it as a means "convenient" to "solvency" all citizens irrespective of their age and whatever their disease, have forgotten one small detail that was to make the system reliable and durable in terms of its
Party means a system inspired collectivist medicine to finance "basic" to a population whose life expectancy did not exceed 63 years, our social security system has failed or been able to adapt to the explosion of supply and demand medical ..
The other problem facing doctors is ideological: it has become almost indecent to earn money taking care of its citizens ... And this regardless of the time spent there and whatever the personal investment to which we could have consent to do so. The
same qualifiers off employees are assigned to physicians as the Liberals ... The salary of an emergency room even though I personally deems inadequate, is considered a fortune compared to the minimum wage ... in a country where "rich" starts at 2000 euro, and the tax burden to well below, and or the sickness insurance system combines 100 billion euro deficit, the proletarianization of medicine is not a surprise. .. and should be continued at the discretion of the failure of increasing system
I think that doctors socialist you are, and all lovers of what they currently collect Safely have sown.
Finally I doubt that all the problems of the public hospital are all "soluble increase means" there are surgical services and emergency or you say "overbooked" with not much. Should resolve that laziness and incompetence are more engines for recruitment within the public and admit that the increase in resources occur after audits OBJECTIVES
JF H
Contrary to what some people think we should not save Social Security in its current state because it is thirty years since the foundation of ALL the problems we face
Those who saw it as a means "convenient" to "solvency" all citizens irrespective of their age and whatever their disease, have forgotten one small detail that was to make the system reliable and durable in terms of its
Party means a system inspired collectivist medicine to finance "basic" to a population whose life expectancy did not exceed 63 years, our social security system has failed or been able to adapt to the explosion of supply and demand medical ..
The other problem facing doctors is ideological: it has become almost indecent to earn money taking care of its citizens ... And this regardless of the time spent there and whatever the personal investment to which we could have consent to do so. The
same qualifiers off employees are assigned to physicians as the Liberals ... The salary of an emergency room even though I personally deems inadequate, is considered a fortune compared to the minimum wage ... in a country where "rich" starts at 2000 euro, and the tax burden to well below, and or the sickness insurance system combines 100 billion euro deficit, the proletarianization of medicine is not a surprise. .. and should be continued at the discretion of the failure of increasing system
I think that doctors socialist you are, and all lovers of what they currently collect Safely have sown.
Finally I doubt that all the problems of the public hospital are all "soluble increase means" there are surgical services and emergency or you say "overbooked" with not much. Should resolve that laziness and incompetence are more engines for recruitment within the public and admit that the increase in resources occur after audits OBJECTIVES
JF H
0 comments:
Post a Comment