Wedding Seating Sample

MUTU: COPS or rogue

"Mutual Insurance and have greater access to health data"
Les Echos Les Echos

find indeed that 'mutual insurance companies and pension funds will now have access to anonymous data for reimbursement of Social Security. "
The newspaper notes that "a decree of the Ministry of Health, which has just been published, authorizes the federations of 3 families of complementary organizations to access Sniiram, the vast database of insurance disease, [...] so they can better predict their expenses. "
The daily noted that "patients' associations, which met in the Collective interassociative health, are suspicious "and" protest ".
Les Echos state that "the government has taken many precautions to prevent misuse of data. This is only the collective data. [...] The decree opens the basic computer solely federations complementary organizations, [...] not to members.
"Finally, access to Sniiram will be via the Institute of Health data, a regulatory body with representation from all stakeholders in the health system, and under the watchful eye of the National Computer and freedoms, "the newspaper said.
Les Echos added: "No way that insurers can select their customers in terms of statistics".
"But these safeguards are not sufficient to reassure the ISSC," notes the daily.
The newspaper cites Christian Saout, President of ISSC, which states: "We have no guarantee as to the nature of the data transferred or how they are used.
Meanwhile, Daniel Lenoir, Director General of French Mutual, said: "There is no risk of selection Medical. This order will allow us to have collective data to refine our analysis and to better forecast our expenses. "
Les Echos notes that "for complementary organizations, this order did not a" first step ". They are now seeking access to personal data for reimbursement of an insured individual, always anonymously.

Congrats Messages To Friends On Marriage

WHY RENOVATE? BEST VAUX

What would be the renovation of the social security and how to operate without a system of socialized medicine?

me I have nothing against, as being a true liberal employee a false There is one thing that annoys me and that is:

To make the system even if that humanly bearable should be democratic advances of such a magnitude that is almost certain never to see the Safely.

I attending this institution for over thirty years I think it is rooted in the logic of trusteeship towards health professionals and social subjugation of the population, and is ready to share with anyone managing the system, if not formally (like popular democracy.

To Safely bearable than it would have to renounce:

1 ° his claims tutelary
2 ° In the social subjection his heirs
3 ° stop using the agent of contributors as if it were his own
4 ° To cease to see themselves as the purchaser of care for patients (it is the patients buyers Safely not care ...)

It will have to accept
1 ° be the insurer social and nothing else
2 ° be an ordinary litigant and nothing else (neither cop nor magistrate, judge or executor of his own sentences)

3 ° conclude with real people written contractual relationships that are protected from administrative decisions of circumstances regarding their treatment.

total AN END TO THE CONCEPT OF TRUST ASSURANCESOCIALE RETHINKING ON AN ACTUAL CONTRACT WITH THE PATIENT AND NOT WITH HEALTH PROFESSIONALS The insurer did not manage public health, but simply to finance I do not like some advocates that health is co-managed by the social security and other insurers INSURERS ARE JUST COLLECTING FUNDS AGENCIES TO ENSURE THE DISEASE RISK.

NOT MAKERS OF HEALTH POLICY NOT OFFICERS OR CONTROLLERS CARE.

INSURERS AND SECU ARE NOT AUTHORIZED TO MANAGE HEALTH.

CAN NOT BE TRIED AND ¨ REFEREE AND PART OF HIS OWN PROBLEMS.

MUST BE COMPLETELY MOUTH FOR NOT UNDERSTANDING THE IMPERATIVE NEED TO PROTECT THE CITIZENS OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS ABOUT THEIR HEALTH.

Only FREE practitioners under the control of their order (renovated ...) and / or committees composed of independent experts from the state and insurance funds, can provide patients with treatment decisions objective.

independence of physicians is also crucial as its judges.

This may finally go by ...

collectivized system has NEVER given to his heirs and any professional way to democratically decide how it should operate and to whose benefit.

The road to a hypothetical restoration of union and political Safely is blocked by those who think the current system and benefit those who eat them.

Safely To make a new will require that the old die

JFH

Clothing To Wide For Me

RESET THE SUBJECT TO THE SECU ARE NOT INSURED

We can not take away the fact that I treat each other "false bottoms of solidarity from" years and it seems rightly ...
There is no moral distinction made between the various forms of health insurance safety, mutual or private There is one major difference is: THE SUBJECT TO THE SECU ARE NOT INSURED sense of the term when the "shared ".... they "are like having the corner of a wood" by their alleged secured additional profit insurers allegedly non-profit .....
who knows the percentage of "redistributed to one euro contributed to a mutual? Hummm? Eh? Say a little to see .... I'll let you find yourself, it will make you a healthy exercise ...
In all cases a good "Livret A" that is broken to pay for expenses such as eyeglasses, dentures or higher fees would be justified smarter ....
I'm surprised that hardly anyone mentions However, the system is to tax the "insurers and the mutual-qui font-of-benefit" system to replenish the integral stems from the willingness of DO NOT REFORM .... USE ADDITIONAL INSURERS TO FUND THE SECU WHAT DOES NOT PAY TO FILL HIS OR DEFICIT IS OVER ANER a patch over, coupled with nonsense about the famous and oh! how sensitive the issue of purchasing power, because insurers will no doubt further pass this tax their contributors .... There is something strange and possibly shameful to want to tax the insurers to save additional insurance collectivized, rather than let them do their job of health insurer ... we'll have to explain .... I must not be smart enough to understand ... unless I'm too ....

MUST CONVINCE THE MUTUAL AND THE SUBJECT THAT SOCIAL:
long as we can not be solved using these bodies in terms of insurance to co-finance the first truly European spending on health of French "The operating deficit of the system collectivized "will grow and everyone will pay the piper ... despite the" hunt for doctors, "despite the ranting anti-IGAS doctors and all those bleating herd of idiots who médicophobes permanent or intermittent appear as they did so shameful and ridiculous in the case of the surgeon allegedly dishonest Chalon sur Saone.

MUST ALSO SATISFY THAT:
Insurers are further from the chandeliers " mouth-hole-de-la-safety "is by taxes levied specifically to address its deficits as has been done recently, as "Lenders" institutional .... In fact, if one realizes that the safety of the operation would be totally impossible without them and a long time, we really wonder why they do not give a direct role ... who benefits from the perpetuation of the disorder, if not in the clique that directs association and those who exploit the notion of solidarity in their anti-liberal.

MUST UNDERSTAND THAT THEY DO:
Few people know what true liberalism and refuse to see it other than the definition by the Socialists as well as some people think what could be a social libéralieme .. they mock Sarkozy wants overhaul capitalism as if he converted to the theses of his political opponents ... This ignores the right-wing French politicians, who are generally more statist and interventionist than their counterparts in other countries. Finally there are the idiots who confuse liberalism and laissez-faire economic and .. this is the laissez-faire capitalism financialisation excessive causing its periodic crises, for reasons well known and increasingly more virtual. There is no credible alternative to overhaul the system. Some benefit from the financial crisis to predict prochaime the end of capitalism they call their wishful thinking and powerless for years, referring to evolutionary theories "smokers" who proclaim its inevitable end, without telling us specifically what they want by replacing it ... then Until credible alternative proposals for the organization of trade and global finance, the recasting of old liberal capitalism is hated rather a good idea ... even (and especially) if it comes to Sarkozy ...

THAT WE BE OR NOT TO BE CARRIED FROM CAPITALISM TO HALF A MILLENNIUM MUST CONVINCE THAT HE:
Reduce the share of "crazy" and irrational in the exercise of global finance is a necessity that neither a socialist nor a sincere liberal can deny If the Socialists could contribute instead of messing around as usual, it would certainly advance the "Schmilblick" but want Do they really think things "capitalism" arrange? I'm sure by many of them certainly prefer the chaos which could, in theory, the emergence of a system more in line with their fixed ideas, if not better ...

MUST CONVINCE ALL THE FRENCH THAT THE SYSTEM OF HEALTH INSURANCE FOR ALL, can not continue without ENLARGEMENT AND WITHOUT DIVERSIFICATION ie without health insurance relieves the collectivized called solidarity of all or part of her mission she loncentre insurance in the future on its true mission, which is indeed solidarity This is all more evident than in the years ahead a crowd of retirees distribution, ie poor but alive for long and more or less sick moreover, will break into the field of solidarity without any insurance for their addiction .. it will be integral to the system to meet the expenses generated by the mere fact of their survival and existence ... Our beloved (and necessary) safety that not even manage to cope with current spending should include a substantial broadening of its mission of solidarity ... it can not do ANYTHING .. those who believe otherwise yield solutions without catastrophic side effects economic-productive and cons .. Reduce the share of "crazy" and irrational in the field of health insurance and social protection is a necessity that no responsible citizen should be denied as the impact of social systems on the economy and important Hire the image of the renal or cardiac over 70 years .. to be cured because he has a life expectancy of 10 years .... and if you treat ... It will take money to do it ... or let it die "severally "...... it falls slowly or not ?.... Reform or horror along the lines of "Soylent Green" .. there is no alternative MUST WE CONVINCE OURSELVES THAT:
time of the "patch" is over for capitalism as for safety .... even if it pisses some people in both camps ... It will take Sarkozy and Delanoe pragmatic and many men of different sensitivity and willingness to drive the irrational left and right and promote social liberalism (eh.. ... Yes)
Consider capitalism as serving a new socialism, without which it has no future is more than reasonable, but also realize that true socialism has no future without the contribution of capitalism redesigned .. . There is no alternative to the more liberal there has to socialism I think even they have no future without each other's irrational is to think that the antagonism secular socialism and capitalism can continue, which will grow wealth for a minority at the expense of the majority of needy is not a credible vision of capitalism, any more than is the vision of spreading the wealth socialism he is unable to produce ...

hunt .... but the irrational change their spots .. that is why I am very worried ... then come to the end of my medical career, I write, I write ... but who cares he is too busy to dwell on partisan bullshit or attempt to Sort this out of dirt daily for open eyes.

Good day
JFH
The man who "blog" in the desert ... and starting to get tired

Dress Gown For Rent Manila

SURGEONS: THE REAL RACKET IS THE ANSWER TO THE SECU

Rusk International Colour Chart#

UFAL

Strongly agree, for a return to the principles of Jules Ferry to secular schools (ie truly secular non-political) to equal opportunities and at the base of the Republican elitism
GOOD ... knowing that even the most devoted teacher and more capable will not bring everything he wants in all heads ... Try to learn the plays of Molière to dropouts requires pre-primary school .. knowing that there will always refractories that resist all teaching techniques. For those where it is find fulfilling and useful manual channels ...
Even if the school has to first give the order to teach more thing for the greatest number, unnecessary overloading to old age with students that studies would be of interest ever.
is certainly the way we maintain at least a portion of school failure
reflection on the school can not make the economics of solutions for this population. Restore nobility to the early learning seems essential.
total to finish with some form demagoguery which is to give everyone a title with a Bachelor's examinations that are not worth our former BEPC ...
Remember your PEBC ... state that a "little tank" full and giving opportunities to those who had received ...
The school's social ladder .. I know. I got it when I was little, I am the son of a single bank employee separated from her husband .. I grew up half my poor grandmother is my teacher who told my grandmother when I was 10, I should go to school ... I was a fellow of higher education, and I did tray + 13 Today, I am forced to admit that it would certainly be harder ... We must return to the old concepts of school Republican in the general interest
I am a figment of Republican elitism and even what I was taught from the 6th to the terminal by the Brothers of Christian Schools of social thought which has never wavered during the 7 years during which I have attended. This may explain that I am for the republican secularism .. Besides, the Catholic religious who taught me, were often from modest backgrounds and have completely fucked the Republican secularism they were not fighting .. There were more protests from Muslims and even the son of Communist workers in my Catholic college, Nancy or I think I had the well-shaped head ... while not cheap Manichaeism Please ... Do not replace the old power of religious fundamentalism before 1905 by a secular politicized that might lead to tension and communalism

IN SUMMARY: I therefore agree with the UFAL on many points ... provided it continues to excessively politicize a debate that should not be ...
Liberalism in its historical definition is not only compatible with the promotion and freedom from knowledge, but certainly easier in this area because it is recognizing the value of individuals without reference to their social status if they are quartered in the same Register stupidly activist, one could say that "the socialist school" is the school of the "global method" of learning to read, one that produces thousands of illiterate adults and adolescents who require, for demagogic reasons, to pursue a general education for which they have no interest or are unable to assimilate

Rotting all debates as you do (unfortunately) with an opposition right / left that has no place, discredits the secular movement for which I also of sympathy

EDUCATION IS NOT A QUESTION OF "PUBLIC OR PRIVATE "BUT A QUESTION OF CONTENT, AND FOLLOW ... and intellectual honesty at all times ... and it is in fact what is the hardest to get UFAL everyone understood, I fear.

I decided to "blog" so that ... I hope my friend Franck Bailly I welcome this opportunity to help me ... as devotees of collectivized health insurance becoming deadly unfortunately the same as the''secular "fundamentalists, some of which are responsible for some of illiterates in our country.


Love to all

JFH

Womens Beach Volleyball

DOCTOR MYSTERY AND CHEESE Magouille

Receiving the letter the UFAL, I'll comment on your video titled Doctor Kickback Scheme.

1 ° In every system there are predators and profiteers, and I have no sympathy for them.

2 ° The health insurance system is a permanent incitement to scam it is based on a written contract that would define in advance the basket of reimbursable care and all those who "pay" by the social security contributions consider their right care for all their demand for care. It is inevitable that some try to take advantage of this "thing" unmanageable where solidarity towards those who do not need to be confused with lack of support for those who die in cardboard boxes amid general indifference .

3 ° "holy just" paranoid as Mr. Fremont do not foresee much change THEIR Safely baby and do everything to keep it as is, with its management social-political-ideological mismanagement, opacity, and even as you point out a possible collusion with the schemers A About scheming one knows exactly how much it costs and who benefits CMU properly? I anesthetized CMU for cosmetic surgery that have paid my fee agreement cash out ... invoice and found moderate rates compared to "Paris" but very heavy for poor or supposed ...

4 ° Besides practicing quite minority who defraud a number of practitioners who have committed or are alleged to have committed "indiscretions" to the social security system whose daily victims a Justice Fund via Sections ordinal Social Insurance genuine emergency courts serving local CPAM petty tyrants who despise totally rules of law and especially those of the right to a defense system called The Ayatollah's rise to any fixed part of the files against their practitioners in the crosshairs for examples (I have names) did not hesitate to denigrate them without trial official with the general population.

When you want to play clean gents should be cleaned every ... It is not for doctors to have agreements with the social security but the patient to have a contract with health insurer As such the conventional system particularly perverse that underlies the alleged social contract between the insurance practitioners and patients is an insult to law permanent disproportion between the power of the social security and the "other" is such that only the resignation or combines lieu of defense. It is a wonderful social conquest in which everyone tries to live at the expense of others by Sort this out as he can, and this will of the insured to the practitioner through the medical officer who obeys instructions fools If the fraud and intent to harm the health insurance are difficult to prove because none of the "speaker has any written contract with each other .. I KNOW DOCTORS ADVICE (often socialist- Communists) who find that having BELLY NOSE OR THROUGH THE NIGHT OF CONTRIBUTORS AND PSYCHOLOGICAL BALANCE CLEAN ONLY APPLIES TO SOCIAL JUSTICE IN SUPPORT OF AN AESTHETIC RESPONSE BY THE COMMUNITY ... Surgery for an abdominal apron hanging .. Becomes refundable at what clinical appearance? What complication? How to judge easily and without appeal as hanging breasts are simply annoying or unsightly Who measure the psychological impact of such deformities?

insurer that supports them ...?

How seriously think that a consulting physician who is allied with the public insurer (or another) and is paid by him, may have an objective assessment on medical or surgical indications?

Encouraging these con-trols "endogamous" leading to a justice "inbred" on Safely is unconsciousness Pure and simple ...

Who is the director of the labor union or the consulting physician? Where is the medical expertise on the part of doctors who claim to judge everything about everything?

explain how they prefer to use the SAS where he is certain to get convictions rather than face the SASS or ordinary courts before which they lose much The agreements often "friendly" you denounce are often a more secure for insurance disease that real judgments. The majority of cases involve different "technical" and differing interpretations of the nomenclature that both parties try to "shoot on his side" without being able to define who is always scheming of the real doctor or physician controlled controller. .. This is certainly such considerations that explain the cautious reserve of senior Mr. Fremont ... even if I give him reason to attack if the acts charged were not carried out .. This is the Ba-Ba fraud .. an offense that allows the body to convict a doctor for sure before a SAS I do not believe in the "simplified" version that you have in your video that is more akin to propaganda than information .. In fact Mr. Frémont became "fired" by his superiors that he disavowed his actions and attempts to rehabilitate himself by resolving to wrong accounts.

1 ° In a democratic country governed by law ... Health insurance should be based on a written contract between an insured and an insurer chosen and not imposed, and not on an alleged social contract in which a defender is Safely proclaimed its affiliates, which are in fact involved without any power to officers acting without a warrant number from them.

2 It must put in place the social security of social insurance, it is not there to define SES SES investigate crimes trial, his pronouncements and enforce ITS convictions. If a private insurer was in the tenth you scream foul and you'd be right. Mr. Fremont that you praise is a paranoid who like all his ilk have built a speech and even coherent outside reality. If he was contradicted by his superiors it was because of repeated abuses of power and to have "educated" himself a number of cases instead of entrusting the cases to judges and independent experts. The use of sapiteurs villains is also a bad habit of the medical health office. I do not deny the social security system the right to attack any unscrupulous doctors, but how it does it most often goes against all forms of democratic justice, and discredit.

3 ° Most of the conflicts between the social security administration and doctors come from the impossibility it is for at least thirty years to finance health expenditures as they occur in the population. On the other hand it is obvious she does not respect any of its treaty commitments whatsoever in respect of fees or in social matters to the medical profession. In 1989 I chose to practice in a holding area that I was making my life quite well and that if the social security reassessments of fees in line with its promises, I did not need to demand extra fees , especially that his promise of my participation in social protection (besides crappy) was related to my price moderation ... What followed has been nothing more conventional: Blocking key letters (K, KC) for 15years and blocking Cs for 10 years. So that if I could live decently in the late 70's by 4-5 per day anesthesia today it takes at least 15 to live in the same way ...

4 ° Given these difficulties, lack of consideration and respect for commitments, the prestige of the social security system in the medical profession has been steadily declining and especially since she could not resist the temptation of authoritarianism desperate to maintain its monopoly obsolete and inefficient.

5 ° Safely is a state within a state, a "cheese" that has long been its own logic, run by a bunch of trade unionists who represent only a small fraction its subject. The power of those who run the social security would be void in our society if it does not cling so desperately to improper management of accounts, which is their last bastion.

6 total people who truly benefit from this system are its creditors (you hate) who profit from its continuing difficulties to fill the pockets of interest juicy every time they lend money for bail. , All others have become victims. Amuse the gallery with some doctors schemers can not hide the action of all the little guys that hundreds of thousands or even millions of defrauding health insurance, which, with a vital card hacked that by being "in sick" which, by being a walk in the VSL for nothing ... etc. thinking "as I win I play ... "

Even without fraud, no errors, (which is impossible) the social security would be in the" cabbage "anyway because the socio-economic and demographic as well as explosion of supply and demand far exceeds its medical statements start ..

To my knowledge neither Karl Marx nor the old moons which you refer does are expressed on these real issues.

IF I was not agnostic, I would ask the Lord to deliver France from the social security and those who continue to defend

Thanks for reading, as I had the patience to do with the letter of UFAL which I did not ask to be subscribed, but I do not ask me to unsubscribe from democratic spirit.

Regards

Dr. JF H

Wedding Message To Couple

DÉFROQUONS U.S.!

There's something I do not understand argumentation in the practice of fees for the different sectors and also leads me to think that it is open to our opponents.

is the notion of time to do his job properly.

S1 Some claim the passage in Sector 2 to have time to properly their job, to them I say: "you do not practice medicine when you committed, you are violating the most elementary rules which are state or ordinal.

Some S2 justify the amount of their fees by the extra time to their patients to do their job when they do THAT THEIR JOB PROPERLY, which should be the minimum when it intends to exercise in private practice .

The reality is that our demands are primarily related to our legitimate demands: an income equivalent than those who practice professions requiring similar skills, the same problems, same issues, the same know-how and its rarity.

We want revenue aligned with other professions, emphasizing that in other professions, Would there not dead men.

We can rightly be proud of saving if not daily, at least weekly, the lives of our customers, or at least make them bearable, and IT HAS NOT PRICE. But we continue to behave like martyrs willing victims of a persecutor designated bad mum on who we blame all our suffering.

Except that we are not bound by anything other than our own consent, without even having set our hand or even have a particular contract.

It's like the story of priests who claim the right to marry. Stay in the claim but that is changing the rules of the framework.

In this configuration strategy we have no chance of winning anything, a priest who wishes to marry off his cassock, he castoff.

So instead of tirelessly pursue our groans and lamentations in Gods-MèreSécu asking for sadness to our poor fate DÉFROQUONS U.S.!
It will be a little while a little painful, but at least we have the pleasure to finish our career, standing right in boots, in good standing with our oath, and leave our children private medicine that we once knew .

Thus, it is

Dr Franck Bailly

Games For Him Online Gay

SECU and AMO



SOCIAL SECURITY & HEALTH INSURANCE


are not synonymous, even if they appear together in 'collective unconscious the French

The term subliminal is MANDATORY and burdened scotomized ment.

It would be a great step in systematically incorporating all stakeholders in the media when they talk about Safely instead of MANDATORY INSURANCE

Orthodox Treatments Complementary Therapies

ARE IN A BOAT AFTER THE ISSUE OF THIRTY YEARS hole Safely 21

Problem statement after thirty years of the hole 21 Inadequate safety reforms

WHAT MOST DOCTORS ACCEPT:

1 AWARENESS OF TIME THE SYSTEM FAILING perceived by 75% of French but not widely accepted by admirers ALL BEATS THE SYSTEM TOGETHER Who persist in TELLING THE DEFENDERS OF PATIENTS IN FACE OF HEALTH PROFESSIONALS.

2 ° INSUFFICIENT MEANS AND REFUSAL OF ENLARGEMENT AND THE DIVERSIFICATION OF RESOURCES FOR ideological and political reasons.

3 disrepute to the medical profession used as a scapegoat.

4 ° POLICY OF CONTINUING CARROT AND STICK TO THE HEALTH PROFESSIONALS IN WHICH ALL HAVE ENOUGH.

5 ° CONTINUAL THREAT.

6 ° STRESS WITHOUT COMPENSATION.

7 ° ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE OF FULLY FUND-I-NA E DMISSIBL

8 ° THE DECLINE OF THEIR CONSTANT penalty of net revenues.

9 ° NEAR THE BURN OUT OF GENERAL HEALTH PROFESSIONALS.

THE DESERT IS CALLED A MEDICAL PROGRESS EVEN IN AREAS PREVIOUSLY over-medicated (see timeline for access to specialists even in areas "very medicalised") ON DOES NOT CATCH FLIES WITH VINEGAR THE NUMBER OF CANDIDATES IN THIS PROFESSION AND FALLING DOWN EVEN MORE IN THE CURRENT CONDITIONS. THE GLOBAL DEAL

WITH THE DOCTORS STARTED ....

-BY RESTORING THEIR MAGISTERIUM, REDEFINING THEIR MISSION AND THEIR PLACE IN SOCIETY.

-BY THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THE MONOPOLY OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY AND THE THOUGHT OF ASSOCIATION AND OBSOLETE COLLECTIVISM endogamy that animates it.

-BY THE DISAPPEARANCE OF JUSTICE FUND FOR JUSTICE REPLACED BY A GIVEN BY THE JUDGES OF INDEPENDENT PROFESSIONAL CASH AS OF THE PROFESSION.

-BY FUNDING SUFFICIENT HEALTH EXPENDITURE INCLUDING THE ENTRY OF ALL ACTUAL AND MUTUAL INSURERS FOR EQUAL TO PRIVATE INSURANCE BASED ON CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITATION TOGETHER DEFINED BY THE STATE MEDICAL INSURERS, ASSOCIATION OF PATIENTS, AND SECURED BY STATE.

-BY RESTORATION OF THEIR FEES TO BE NO LONGER BE "INDEXES ON DEFICIT 'OF FAILED INSURER COLLECTIVIZATION FROM THIRTY YEARS.

-BY POWER RESTORATION OF MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY DEAL WITH A POWER ADMINISTRATIVE ENCROACHMENT WHICH HAS DONE NOTHING GOOD.

-BY TRAINING DIFFERENT DOCTORS? THEY ARE SUITABLE FOR MANAGING THE CARE OF BUSINESS, TO MEASURE THEIR EFFICIENCY AND PRODUCTIVITY => WHICH MEANS A SUPPRESSION IN MEDICAL STUDIES, PORTIONS OF CONTENTS FOR NOT ONLY THE SELECTION FOR THE BENEFIT OF CONCEPTS MANAGEMENT AND MEDICAL ECONOMICS.

BY-SHUTDOWN MODE SELECTION CURRENT CHARACTERIZED BY STUPID 'straighten COMPETENT FRENCH "AND" importation "of foreign doctors who escaped the selection.

-BY GROWING INCOME RATHER THAN BY THE SAME PROCEDURE AND PAPERWORK.

-BY MEANS OF A REAL RESEARCH FOR HEALTH without ideological.

-BY THE AWARENESS THAT HEALTH IS ALSO AN INDUSTRY AND A WORKING TOOL FOR THOUSANDS OF PROFESSIONAL AND NOT A "GOOD STANDING OUT.

-PAYMENT BY THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OF ALL THAT HE IS THE ORDER sustain and improve the provisions SOLIDARITY.

BY-THE JUDGEMENT OF THE MEDICAL demonization of LIBERALISM THAT WAS NEVER THE SOLIDARITY antinomy.

BY-THE JUDGEMENT OF THE POLITICAL SOLIDARITY Incantatory CHARACTERIZED BY MEANS OF SENSIBLE INSSUFISANCE BE COMPATIBLE WITH IMPROVING THE QUALITY "BETTER CARE FOR SPEND LESS" HAS THE MEANING OF THAT FOR THOSE WHO DO NOT KNOW A WORD OF MEDICINE TRAITOR; (heals better when it delivers more Survivors in the system of health insurance called solidarity ... and PAYG both bankrupt ....)

well ....
become aware of the inevitable increase in health spending,
the impossibility of zero error and zero waste in one complex system
to do away with the relevance of retrospective called experts said it was "an afterthought" unnecessary expense
and have a real methodology to predict the increase in age-related expenditure and therapeutic success as well as new medical challenges ahead ...

AND ESPECIALLY
stop denying What bothers .. . MEDICAL PROGRESS AND THE PREVENTION DOES NOT REDUCE THE NUMBER OF DISEASES OR THE NUMBER OF PATIENTS THEY do increase the number of survivors ......

THEN .... THE DEAL WITH THE GLOBAL DOCTORS WILL BEGIN ......

CORDIALLY ALL.

DR JF H