Womens Beach Volleyball

DOCTOR MYSTERY AND CHEESE Magouille

Receiving the letter the UFAL, I'll comment on your video titled Doctor Kickback Scheme.

1 ° In every system there are predators and profiteers, and I have no sympathy for them.

2 ° The health insurance system is a permanent incitement to scam it is based on a written contract that would define in advance the basket of reimbursable care and all those who "pay" by the social security contributions consider their right care for all their demand for care. It is inevitable that some try to take advantage of this "thing" unmanageable where solidarity towards those who do not need to be confused with lack of support for those who die in cardboard boxes amid general indifference .

3 ° "holy just" paranoid as Mr. Fremont do not foresee much change THEIR Safely baby and do everything to keep it as is, with its management social-political-ideological mismanagement, opacity, and even as you point out a possible collusion with the schemers A About scheming one knows exactly how much it costs and who benefits CMU properly? I anesthetized CMU for cosmetic surgery that have paid my fee agreement cash out ... invoice and found moderate rates compared to "Paris" but very heavy for poor or supposed ...

4 ° Besides practicing quite minority who defraud a number of practitioners who have committed or are alleged to have committed "indiscretions" to the social security system whose daily victims a Justice Fund via Sections ordinal Social Insurance genuine emergency courts serving local CPAM petty tyrants who despise totally rules of law and especially those of the right to a defense system called The Ayatollah's rise to any fixed part of the files against their practitioners in the crosshairs for examples (I have names) did not hesitate to denigrate them without trial official with the general population.

When you want to play clean gents should be cleaned every ... It is not for doctors to have agreements with the social security but the patient to have a contract with health insurer As such the conventional system particularly perverse that underlies the alleged social contract between the insurance practitioners and patients is an insult to law permanent disproportion between the power of the social security and the "other" is such that only the resignation or combines lieu of defense. It is a wonderful social conquest in which everyone tries to live at the expense of others by Sort this out as he can, and this will of the insured to the practitioner through the medical officer who obeys instructions fools If the fraud and intent to harm the health insurance are difficult to prove because none of the "speaker has any written contract with each other .. I KNOW DOCTORS ADVICE (often socialist- Communists) who find that having BELLY NOSE OR THROUGH THE NIGHT OF CONTRIBUTORS AND PSYCHOLOGICAL BALANCE CLEAN ONLY APPLIES TO SOCIAL JUSTICE IN SUPPORT OF AN AESTHETIC RESPONSE BY THE COMMUNITY ... Surgery for an abdominal apron hanging .. Becomes refundable at what clinical appearance? What complication? How to judge easily and without appeal as hanging breasts are simply annoying or unsightly Who measure the psychological impact of such deformities?

insurer that supports them ...?

How seriously think that a consulting physician who is allied with the public insurer (or another) and is paid by him, may have an objective assessment on medical or surgical indications?

Encouraging these con-trols "endogamous" leading to a justice "inbred" on Safely is unconsciousness Pure and simple ...

Who is the director of the labor union or the consulting physician? Where is the medical expertise on the part of doctors who claim to judge everything about everything?

explain how they prefer to use the SAS where he is certain to get convictions rather than face the SASS or ordinary courts before which they lose much The agreements often "friendly" you denounce are often a more secure for insurance disease that real judgments. The majority of cases involve different "technical" and differing interpretations of the nomenclature that both parties try to "shoot on his side" without being able to define who is always scheming of the real doctor or physician controlled controller. .. This is certainly such considerations that explain the cautious reserve of senior Mr. Fremont ... even if I give him reason to attack if the acts charged were not carried out .. This is the Ba-Ba fraud .. an offense that allows the body to convict a doctor for sure before a SAS I do not believe in the "simplified" version that you have in your video that is more akin to propaganda than information .. In fact Mr. Frémont became "fired" by his superiors that he disavowed his actions and attempts to rehabilitate himself by resolving to wrong accounts.

1 ° In a democratic country governed by law ... Health insurance should be based on a written contract between an insured and an insurer chosen and not imposed, and not on an alleged social contract in which a defender is Safely proclaimed its affiliates, which are in fact involved without any power to officers acting without a warrant number from them.

2 It must put in place the social security of social insurance, it is not there to define SES SES investigate crimes trial, his pronouncements and enforce ITS convictions. If a private insurer was in the tenth you scream foul and you'd be right. Mr. Fremont that you praise is a paranoid who like all his ilk have built a speech and even coherent outside reality. If he was contradicted by his superiors it was because of repeated abuses of power and to have "educated" himself a number of cases instead of entrusting the cases to judges and independent experts. The use of sapiteurs villains is also a bad habit of the medical health office. I do not deny the social security system the right to attack any unscrupulous doctors, but how it does it most often goes against all forms of democratic justice, and discredit.

3 ° Most of the conflicts between the social security administration and doctors come from the impossibility it is for at least thirty years to finance health expenditures as they occur in the population. On the other hand it is obvious she does not respect any of its treaty commitments whatsoever in respect of fees or in social matters to the medical profession. In 1989 I chose to practice in a holding area that I was making my life quite well and that if the social security reassessments of fees in line with its promises, I did not need to demand extra fees , especially that his promise of my participation in social protection (besides crappy) was related to my price moderation ... What followed has been nothing more conventional: Blocking key letters (K, KC) for 15years and blocking Cs for 10 years. So that if I could live decently in the late 70's by 4-5 per day anesthesia today it takes at least 15 to live in the same way ...

4 ° Given these difficulties, lack of consideration and respect for commitments, the prestige of the social security system in the medical profession has been steadily declining and especially since she could not resist the temptation of authoritarianism desperate to maintain its monopoly obsolete and inefficient.

5 ° Safely is a state within a state, a "cheese" that has long been its own logic, run by a bunch of trade unionists who represent only a small fraction its subject. The power of those who run the social security would be void in our society if it does not cling so desperately to improper management of accounts, which is their last bastion.

6 total people who truly benefit from this system are its creditors (you hate) who profit from its continuing difficulties to fill the pockets of interest juicy every time they lend money for bail. , All others have become victims. Amuse the gallery with some doctors schemers can not hide the action of all the little guys that hundreds of thousands or even millions of defrauding health insurance, which, with a vital card hacked that by being "in sick" which, by being a walk in the VSL for nothing ... etc. thinking "as I win I play ... "

Even without fraud, no errors, (which is impossible) the social security would be in the" cabbage "anyway because the socio-economic and demographic as well as explosion of supply and demand far exceeds its medical statements start ..

To my knowledge neither Karl Marx nor the old moons which you refer does are expressed on these real issues.

IF I was not agnostic, I would ask the Lord to deliver France from the social security and those who continue to defend

Thanks for reading, as I had the patience to do with the letter of UFAL which I did not ask to be subscribed, but I do not ask me to unsubscribe from democratic spirit.

Regards

Dr. JF H