We can not take away the fact that I treat each other "false bottoms of solidarity from" years and it seems rightly ...
There is no moral distinction made between the various forms of health insurance safety, mutual or private There is one major difference is: THE SUBJECT TO THE SECU ARE NOT INSURED sense of the term when the "shared ".... they "are like having the corner of a wood" by their alleged secured additional profit insurers allegedly non-profit .....
who knows the percentage of "redistributed to one euro contributed to a mutual? Hummm? Eh? Say a little to see .... I'll let you find yourself, it will make you a healthy exercise ...
In all cases a good "Livret A" that is broken to pay for expenses such as eyeglasses, dentures or higher fees would be justified smarter ....
I'm surprised that hardly anyone mentions However, the system is to tax the "insurers and the mutual-qui font-of-benefit" system to replenish the integral stems from the willingness of DO NOT REFORM .... USE ADDITIONAL INSURERS TO FUND THE SECU WHAT DOES NOT PAY TO FILL HIS OR DEFICIT IS OVER ANER a patch over, coupled with nonsense about the famous and oh! how sensitive the issue of purchasing power, because insurers will no doubt further pass this tax their contributors .... There is something strange and possibly shameful to want to tax the insurers to save additional insurance collectivized, rather than let them do their job of health insurer ... we'll have to explain .... I must not be smart enough to understand ... unless I'm too ....
MUST CONVINCE THE MUTUAL AND THE SUBJECT THAT SOCIAL:
long as we can not be solved using these bodies in terms of insurance to co-finance the first truly European spending on health of French "The operating deficit of the system collectivized "will grow and everyone will pay the piper ... despite the" hunt for doctors, "despite the ranting anti-IGAS doctors and all those bleating herd of idiots who médicophobes permanent or intermittent appear as they did so shameful and ridiculous in the case of the surgeon allegedly dishonest Chalon sur Saone.
MUST ALSO SATISFY THAT:
Insurers are further from the chandeliers " mouth-hole-de-la-safety "is by taxes levied specifically to address its deficits as has been done recently, as "Lenders" institutional .... In fact, if one realizes that the safety of the operation would be totally impossible without them and a long time, we really wonder why they do not give a direct role ... who benefits from the perpetuation of the disorder, if not in the clique that directs association and those who exploit the notion of solidarity in their anti-liberal.
MUST UNDERSTAND THAT THEY DO:
Few people know what true liberalism and refuse to see it other than the definition by the Socialists as well as some people think what could be a social libéralieme .. they mock Sarkozy wants overhaul capitalism as if he converted to the theses of his political opponents ... This ignores the right-wing French politicians, who are generally more statist and interventionist than their counterparts in other countries. Finally there are the idiots who confuse liberalism and laissez-faire economic and .. this is the laissez-faire capitalism financialisation excessive causing its periodic crises, for reasons well known and increasingly more virtual. There is no credible alternative to overhaul the system. Some benefit from the financial crisis to predict prochaime the end of capitalism they call their wishful thinking and powerless for years, referring to evolutionary theories "smokers" who proclaim its inevitable end, without telling us specifically what they want by replacing it ... then Until credible alternative proposals for the organization of trade and global finance, the recasting of old liberal capitalism is hated rather a good idea ... even (and especially) if it comes to Sarkozy ...
THAT WE BE OR NOT TO BE CARRIED FROM CAPITALISM TO HALF A MILLENNIUM MUST CONVINCE THAT HE:
Reduce the share of "crazy" and irrational in the exercise of global finance is a necessity that neither a socialist nor a sincere liberal can deny If the Socialists could contribute instead of messing around as usual, it would certainly advance the "Schmilblick" but want Do they really think things "capitalism" arrange? I'm sure by many of them certainly prefer the chaos which could, in theory, the emergence of a system more in line with their fixed ideas, if not better ...
MUST CONVINCE ALL THE FRENCH THAT THE SYSTEM OF HEALTH INSURANCE FOR ALL, can not continue without ENLARGEMENT AND WITHOUT DIVERSIFICATION ie without health insurance relieves the collectivized called solidarity of all or part of her mission she loncentre insurance in the future on its true mission, which is indeed solidarity This is all more evident than in the years ahead a crowd of retirees distribution, ie poor but alive for long and more or less sick moreover, will break into the field of solidarity without any insurance for their addiction .. it will be integral to the system to meet the expenses generated by the mere fact of their survival and existence ... Our beloved (and necessary) safety that not even manage to cope with current spending should include a substantial broadening of its mission of solidarity ... it can not do ANYTHING .. those who believe otherwise yield solutions without catastrophic side effects economic-productive and cons .. Reduce the share of "crazy" and irrational in the field of health insurance and social protection is a necessity that no responsible citizen should be denied as the impact of social systems on the economy and important Hire the image of the renal or cardiac over 70 years .. to be cured because he has a life expectancy of 10 years .... and if you treat ... It will take money to do it ... or let it die "severally "...... it falls slowly or not ?.... Reform or horror along the lines of "Soylent Green" .. there is no alternative MUST WE CONVINCE OURSELVES THAT:
time of the "patch" is over for capitalism as for safety .... even if it pisses some people in both camps ... It will take Sarkozy and Delanoe pragmatic and many men of different sensitivity and willingness to drive the irrational left and right and promote social liberalism (eh.. ... Yes)
Consider capitalism as serving a new socialism, without which it has no future is more than reasonable, but also realize that true socialism has no future without the contribution of capitalism redesigned .. . There is no alternative to the more liberal there has to socialism I think even they have no future without each other's irrational is to think that the antagonism secular socialism and capitalism can continue, which will grow wealth for a minority at the expense of the majority of needy is not a credible vision of capitalism, any more than is the vision of spreading the wealth socialism he is unable to produce ...
hunt .... but the irrational change their spots .. that is why I am very worried ... then come to the end of my medical career, I write, I write ... but who cares he is too busy to dwell on partisan bullshit or attempt to Sort this out of dirt daily for open eyes.
Good day
JFH
The man who "blog" in the desert ... and starting to get tired
There is no moral distinction made between the various forms of health insurance safety, mutual or private There is one major difference is: THE SUBJECT TO THE SECU ARE NOT INSURED sense of the term when the "shared ".... they "are like having the corner of a wood" by their alleged secured additional profit insurers allegedly non-profit .....
who knows the percentage of "redistributed to one euro contributed to a mutual? Hummm? Eh? Say a little to see .... I'll let you find yourself, it will make you a healthy exercise ...
In all cases a good "Livret A" that is broken to pay for expenses such as eyeglasses, dentures or higher fees would be justified smarter ....
I'm surprised that hardly anyone mentions However, the system is to tax the "insurers and the mutual-qui font-of-benefit" system to replenish the integral stems from the willingness of DO NOT REFORM .... USE ADDITIONAL INSURERS TO FUND THE SECU WHAT DOES NOT PAY TO FILL HIS OR DEFICIT IS OVER ANER a patch over, coupled with nonsense about the famous and oh! how sensitive the issue of purchasing power, because insurers will no doubt further pass this tax their contributors .... There is something strange and possibly shameful to want to tax the insurers to save additional insurance collectivized, rather than let them do their job of health insurer ... we'll have to explain .... I must not be smart enough to understand ... unless I'm too ....
MUST CONVINCE THE MUTUAL AND THE SUBJECT THAT SOCIAL:
long as we can not be solved using these bodies in terms of insurance to co-finance the first truly European spending on health of French "The operating deficit of the system collectivized "will grow and everyone will pay the piper ... despite the" hunt for doctors, "despite the ranting anti-IGAS doctors and all those bleating herd of idiots who médicophobes permanent or intermittent appear as they did so shameful and ridiculous in the case of the surgeon allegedly dishonest Chalon sur Saone.
MUST ALSO SATISFY THAT:
Insurers are further from the chandeliers " mouth-hole-de-la-safety "is by taxes levied specifically to address its deficits as has been done recently, as "Lenders" institutional .... In fact, if one realizes that the safety of the operation would be totally impossible without them and a long time, we really wonder why they do not give a direct role ... who benefits from the perpetuation of the disorder, if not in the clique that directs association and those who exploit the notion of solidarity in their anti-liberal.
MUST UNDERSTAND THAT THEY DO:
Few people know what true liberalism and refuse to see it other than the definition by the Socialists as well as some people think what could be a social libéralieme .. they mock Sarkozy wants overhaul capitalism as if he converted to the theses of his political opponents ... This ignores the right-wing French politicians, who are generally more statist and interventionist than their counterparts in other countries. Finally there are the idiots who confuse liberalism and laissez-faire economic and .. this is the laissez-faire capitalism financialisation excessive causing its periodic crises, for reasons well known and increasingly more virtual. There is no credible alternative to overhaul the system. Some benefit from the financial crisis to predict prochaime the end of capitalism they call their wishful thinking and powerless for years, referring to evolutionary theories "smokers" who proclaim its inevitable end, without telling us specifically what they want by replacing it ... then Until credible alternative proposals for the organization of trade and global finance, the recasting of old liberal capitalism is hated rather a good idea ... even (and especially) if it comes to Sarkozy ...
THAT WE BE OR NOT TO BE CARRIED FROM CAPITALISM TO HALF A MILLENNIUM MUST CONVINCE THAT HE:
Reduce the share of "crazy" and irrational in the exercise of global finance is a necessity that neither a socialist nor a sincere liberal can deny If the Socialists could contribute instead of messing around as usual, it would certainly advance the "Schmilblick" but want Do they really think things "capitalism" arrange? I'm sure by many of them certainly prefer the chaos which could, in theory, the emergence of a system more in line with their fixed ideas, if not better ...
MUST CONVINCE ALL THE FRENCH THAT THE SYSTEM OF HEALTH INSURANCE FOR ALL, can not continue without ENLARGEMENT AND WITHOUT DIVERSIFICATION ie without health insurance relieves the collectivized called solidarity of all or part of her mission she loncentre insurance in the future on its true mission, which is indeed solidarity This is all more evident than in the years ahead a crowd of retirees distribution, ie poor but alive for long and more or less sick moreover, will break into the field of solidarity without any insurance for their addiction .. it will be integral to the system to meet the expenses generated by the mere fact of their survival and existence ... Our beloved (and necessary) safety that not even manage to cope with current spending should include a substantial broadening of its mission of solidarity ... it can not do ANYTHING .. those who believe otherwise yield solutions without catastrophic side effects economic-productive and cons .. Reduce the share of "crazy" and irrational in the field of health insurance and social protection is a necessity that no responsible citizen should be denied as the impact of social systems on the economy and important Hire the image of the renal or cardiac over 70 years .. to be cured because he has a life expectancy of 10 years .... and if you treat ... It will take money to do it ... or let it die "severally "...... it falls slowly or not ?.... Reform or horror along the lines of "Soylent Green" .. there is no alternative MUST WE CONVINCE OURSELVES THAT:
time of the "patch" is over for capitalism as for safety .... even if it pisses some people in both camps ... It will take Sarkozy and Delanoe pragmatic and many men of different sensitivity and willingness to drive the irrational left and right and promote social liberalism (eh.. ... Yes)
Consider capitalism as serving a new socialism, without which it has no future is more than reasonable, but also realize that true socialism has no future without the contribution of capitalism redesigned .. . There is no alternative to the more liberal there has to socialism I think even they have no future without each other's irrational is to think that the antagonism secular socialism and capitalism can continue, which will grow wealth for a minority at the expense of the majority of needy is not a credible vision of capitalism, any more than is the vision of spreading the wealth socialism he is unable to produce ...
hunt .... but the irrational change their spots .. that is why I am very worried ... then come to the end of my medical career, I write, I write ... but who cares he is too busy to dwell on partisan bullshit or attempt to Sort this out of dirt daily for open eyes.
Good day
JFH
The man who "blog" in the desert ... and starting to get tired
0 comments:
Post a Comment