There's something I do not understand argumentation in the practice of fees for the different sectors and also leads me to think that it is open to our opponents.
is the notion of time to do his job properly.
S1 Some claim the passage in Sector 2 to have time to properly their job, to them I say: "you do not practice medicine when you committed, you are violating the most elementary rules which are state or ordinal.
Some S2 justify the amount of their fees by the extra time to their patients to do their job when they do THAT THEIR JOB PROPERLY, which should be the minimum when it intends to exercise in private practice .
The reality is that our demands are primarily related to our legitimate demands: an income equivalent than those who practice professions requiring similar skills, the same problems, same issues, the same know-how and its rarity.
We want revenue aligned with other professions, emphasizing that in other professions, Would there not dead men.
We can rightly be proud of saving if not daily, at least weekly, the lives of our customers, or at least make them bearable, and IT HAS NOT PRICE. But we continue to behave like martyrs willing victims of a persecutor designated bad mum on who we blame all our suffering.
Except that we are not bound by anything other than our own consent, without even having set our hand or even have a particular contract.
It's like the story of priests who claim the right to marry. Stay in the claim but that is changing the rules of the framework.
In this configuration strategy we have no chance of winning anything, a priest who wishes to marry off his cassock, he castoff.
So instead of tirelessly pursue our groans and lamentations in Gods-MèreSécu asking for sadness to our poor fate DÉFROQUONS U.S.!
It will be a little while a little painful, but at least we have the pleasure to finish our career, standing right in boots, in good standing with our oath, and leave our children private medicine that we once knew .
Thus, it is
Dr Franck Bailly
is the notion of time to do his job properly.
S1 Some claim the passage in Sector 2 to have time to properly their job, to them I say: "you do not practice medicine when you committed, you are violating the most elementary rules which are state or ordinal.
Some S2 justify the amount of their fees by the extra time to their patients to do their job when they do THAT THEIR JOB PROPERLY, which should be the minimum when it intends to exercise in private practice .
The reality is that our demands are primarily related to our legitimate demands: an income equivalent than those who practice professions requiring similar skills, the same problems, same issues, the same know-how and its rarity.
We want revenue aligned with other professions, emphasizing that in other professions, Would there not dead men.
We can rightly be proud of saving if not daily, at least weekly, the lives of our customers, or at least make them bearable, and IT HAS NOT PRICE. But we continue to behave like martyrs willing victims of a persecutor designated bad mum on who we blame all our suffering.
Except that we are not bound by anything other than our own consent, without even having set our hand or even have a particular contract.
It's like the story of priests who claim the right to marry. Stay in the claim but that is changing the rules of the framework.
In this configuration strategy we have no chance of winning anything, a priest who wishes to marry off his cassock, he castoff.
So instead of tirelessly pursue our groans and lamentations in Gods-MèreSécu asking for sadness to our poor fate DÉFROQUONS U.S.!
It will be a little while a little painful, but at least we have the pleasure to finish our career, standing right in boots, in good standing with our oath, and leave our children private medicine that we once knew .
Thus, it is
Dr Franck Bailly
0 comments:
Post a Comment