anesthesiologist since 1976, and thinking that my opinion may CSMF the interest and some others here:
Sample of CSMF is bogus because it is made by a union that is self-proclaimed defender of a medical profession that it ignores much of problems.
CSMF The same "opponent" is in what we called "the espéritude" not to speak like Ségolène, but to translate this blend of illusions and false hopes that characterize the action of the French medical unions face Social Security into bankruptcy since the early 70
say that 71% of physicians have "good relations" with funds equivalent to saying that 71% of doctors have few dealings with credit unions and does not ask to have them and those who do support them long ago. DOCTORS DO NOT WANT THE FUND OF MEDICINE NOT MORE THAN THE JUSTICE FUND let this be in the ministries and the HAS.
All those who believe, out of respect for their ethics and their ethics, that "Paying Agency" is neither the officer nor care the controller nor the court physician, STAND UP AND BE RESOLVED FIGHT THOSE WHO THINK THE OPPOSITE.
The rest of the blah-blah reported in this survey is to match up the stencil to approximate through the useless or by evidence, while ignoring the number one problem of health in France since THIRTY YEARS: ITS INADEQUATE FUNDING structurally.
The assertion that doctors are in a period of doubt is a step backwards compared to reality ..... doctors have no doubt the inability of the Trust (the only term that smile or cringe as the character) to solve the problems faced by the healthcare system.
say that doctors are TOTALLY HOSTILE TO THE GOVERNMENT AND THE CONVENTIONAL SYSTEM IN WHICH THEY MEET THEIR MOST VAIN HOPES is closer to reality.
In fact, claim that there is only one element to describe relations practitioners and the social security of conventional is pure waffle ...
An agreement is by definition a voluntary process for both parties (the doctors are actually forced into agreement by Tariff Authority) must be an agreement and indenture does not contain clauses potestative (the social security changes the the same rules and laws, according to his whim ...).
say that doctors rely on medical unions in general and in particular CSMF is to practice another form of jargon ... Is to deny the periodic leakage or permanent medical specialists to associations or coordination, and even to new unions as UCDF all created in response to union activity "traditional".
The survey performed in the operating room where I work at least 12 hours per day for over thirty years, shows that the majority of Surgeons and anesthesiologists obstetricians, feel they are not represented by CSMF and the UMESPE, any more than by their unions called vertical.
JFH
Sample of CSMF is bogus because it is made by a union that is self-proclaimed defender of a medical profession that it ignores much of problems.
CSMF The same "opponent" is in what we called "the espéritude" not to speak like Ségolène, but to translate this blend of illusions and false hopes that characterize the action of the French medical unions face Social Security into bankruptcy since the early 70
say that 71% of physicians have "good relations" with funds equivalent to saying that 71% of doctors have few dealings with credit unions and does not ask to have them and those who do support them long ago. DOCTORS DO NOT WANT THE FUND OF MEDICINE NOT MORE THAN THE JUSTICE FUND let this be in the ministries and the HAS.
All those who believe, out of respect for their ethics and their ethics, that "Paying Agency" is neither the officer nor care the controller nor the court physician, STAND UP AND BE RESOLVED FIGHT THOSE WHO THINK THE OPPOSITE.
The rest of the blah-blah reported in this survey is to match up the stencil to approximate through the useless or by evidence, while ignoring the number one problem of health in France since THIRTY YEARS: ITS INADEQUATE FUNDING structurally.
The assertion that doctors are in a period of doubt is a step backwards compared to reality ..... doctors have no doubt the inability of the Trust (the only term that smile or cringe as the character) to solve the problems faced by the healthcare system.
say that doctors are TOTALLY HOSTILE TO THE GOVERNMENT AND THE CONVENTIONAL SYSTEM IN WHICH THEY MEET THEIR MOST VAIN HOPES is closer to reality.
In fact, claim that there is only one element to describe relations practitioners and the social security of conventional is pure waffle ...
An agreement is by definition a voluntary process for both parties (the doctors are actually forced into agreement by Tariff Authority) must be an agreement and indenture does not contain clauses potestative (the social security changes the the same rules and laws, according to his whim ...).
say that doctors rely on medical unions in general and in particular CSMF is to practice another form of jargon ... Is to deny the periodic leakage or permanent medical specialists to associations or coordination, and even to new unions as UCDF all created in response to union activity "traditional".
The survey performed in the operating room where I work at least 12 hours per day for over thirty years, shows that the majority of Surgeons and anesthesiologists obstetricians, feel they are not represented by CSMF and the UMESPE, any more than by their unions called vertical.
JFH
0 comments:
Post a Comment